Froch V Dirrell on ITV1

Froch-Dirrell
1. 10-9
2. 9-10
3. 10-9
4. 9-10
5. 9-10
6. 10-9
7. 9-10
8. 10-9
9. 10-9
10. 9-9
11. 9-10
12. 10-9

114-113 for Froch.

Round 7 I found hard to score as I think Dirrell was doing a lot of spoiling but may have just nicked it. Could've possibly been even.
Round 12 Dirrell did the clean work for the first half but gave it away in the last half by not engaging and letting Froch come onto him and throw many wild barrages on the ropes.
Round 11 was brilliant by Dirrell.

The other rounds I could have a clear conscience and could argue how I scored them correctly, so a split decision scoreline is a fair result I believe and no 'robbery'.

 

Froch won the fight, I can't see any other way. I give zero points for running, falling down on canvas, complaining and holding.

 

Dirrell-Froch
1. 10-9 (effective punching)
2. 10-9 (effective Punching)
3. 10-9 (effective punching)
4. 10-9 (effective punching)
5. 10-9 (effective punching)
6. 10-9 (effective punching)
7. 9-10 (lost round for negativity)
8. 9-10 (lost round for negativity)
9. 9-10 (lost round for negativity)
10. 9-9 ( Dirrell won the round plus he buckles Froch but he got the point deduction)
11. 10-9 (Dirrell won this very clearly)
12. 10-9 (Dirrell defiantly won this one aswell by dominating the first 2 minutes, Froch trys to it steal in the last 40 seconds)

116-111 for Dirrell .

 

Just a small point that leads me to believe that you have either made a mistake or are not fully conversant with the 10 points must system...round ten you have Dirrell winning the round but you have given Froch 10 points, why?
BTW, there is no way on Gods green earth that the American won the first 6 rounds, thats insane...**** card, sorry

 

I gave Froch the 10th round because Dirrell got a point deduction (read my post) Froch did'nt land anything effective in the first 6 rounds, so yeah he did win them in my opinion. you should watch the fight again.

 

If you think Dirrel won the 10th then you should give him 10 points and Froch 9. With the point deduction that leaves it 9-9.

 

You've confused me even more. You said in your post:

"10. 9-10 ( Dirrell won the round plus he buckles Froch but he got the point deduction)"

But you gave Froch 10 points, even though you said that Dirrell won the round...Given what you have said, and taking into account the point deduction, the round by your reckoning should have been scored 9-9...you do realise that when a fighter has a point deducted it doesn't get added to the opponents tally?

You want us to take you seriously but you obviously don't know how to score a fight.

 

but fights are scored with a 10 point must system

 

No mate, 10 point must before deductions. You score the round (10-9 Dirrell in this case) and then apply the deduction to Dirrel to get a 9-9 round.

What you've done is not deduct a point from Dirrell, you've added one to Froch.

 

oh right I did'nt understand that it changed when a deduction occur's, I'll change that round to 9-9 then.