froch v pavlik

Kelly is still 160, isn't Froch 168? Yeah. That would be running. He had a hard time getting a fight that anyone would back as it is. HBO wants him fighting NAMES now.

 

Jermain Taylor will spark Jeff Lacy.
Froch will beat Pascal.
Jermain will be Froch's 1st mandatory.
Taylor TKO11 Froch.

If Pavlik and Froch fought, Pavlik would take Froch out inside 7 rounds. Froch has a habit of dropping his left. Against Pavlik that gets you knocked the **** out.

 

i dont underate pavlik, he's a terrific fighter and this is in no means meant to sound like i'm taking any of his credibility away from him, but he's beaten a B - grade fighter in Miranda IMO, he beat a middleweight champ who grabbed sevral dubious decisions including a draw then resorted to fighting blown up welters before having any real challenger in pavlik, who was close to being taken out by him mind, then pav wins the belts, all respect, then he takes on Gary ****ing Lockett, i know he was granted a shot at the title but wtf, now every ones on the bandwagon. I think Kelly will have a much much harder time against bernard hopkins than a hell of a lot of people actually think, alot of people are thinking hell b-hops shot deep down, but in my opinion this will show how good kelly is. I do respect Kelly Pavlik, i like his fight style, but i dont like the way people think he is some kind of undestructable monster, it reminds me of cotto, this being the reason why i feel Froch would have a very good chance on taking him out at Carls weight

 

Taylor knock out Froch? atsch

You are certifiably insane, as daft as a brush and as blind as a bat. Taylor can't knock out CORY SPINKS and KASSIM OUMA, I mean hello...could it get any more obvious his power ain't **** at 168?

Infact, he hasn't knocked out one good opponent. Not one. Infact, I dare you to name me one.

 

wtf r u on about, kellys moving up to fight b-hop, why couldnt he to fight froch. i wasnt even implieing kelly would run, sarcasm on forums doesnt really work son, jog on, you sound like another bitter american who doesnt like it when somebody on the outside puts there views across on somebody you lot like.

 

i'm glad someone sees my point, i laughed at the fact someone thought taylor would ko froch too, must be high

 

You're talking about good opponents. Who said Froch was a good opponent? The man is not even close to being in the same class with Taylor, Kessler, Pavlik, et.

 

I have NO idea how you get this from my post. The relevant point is that I doubt there would be money in a Froch/Pavlik fight. HBO won't put up for the mandatories in the MW division. How is this bitter? You must be looking in a mirror.

 

well if you go back and look then you for some reason bring there weight divisions into the topic and after this decided to use sarcasm to make yourself sound smarter, i merely stated that it has no relevance what so ever as Pavlik is moving up to fight B-pops, so if froch carries on winning and finally manages to get that pussie taylor in the ring and beats him i feel he'll be a cert for kelly, one in which will post kelly his hardest fight after b-pops.

 

Man Crush !!!

 

I used weights in light of the 'ducking/running' whatever charge. Pavlik isn't obligated to fight everyone at 168 that calls him out. At this point, NO way he be considered to be ducking Froch. Especially since no one would pay him to fight Froch. Which is why even Taylor wouldn't fight him for the belt. No money in it at this point.

 

I think he moved under the bridge and became a troll a while back.

 

Why should we care about Froch and what has he done to merit a chance like this? if Froch could care less about exciting our imagination why should we be excited about his career.

 

Everyone you've mentionned in your post is better then anyone on Froch's record. That's why Pavlik is highly rated and Froch isn't.

 

Who's Froch?