Hagler would kill Tocker Pudwill at 168 or any other weight despite Tocker Pudwill having a better SMW resume than Hagler. The boxrec logic is easily refuted here.
I agree with what your saying but you're going way off point. Moving down generally affects a fighter very badly and for me Johnson and Mack were both pretty tame title defences.
You are going off topic and maybe misunderstood what was asked. I dont think anybody would predict Pudwill to give Hagler problems, but I dont know why you brought up Hagler or Pudwill as they are not in question or relevant to my question. I asked someone to explain how Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell etc were good SMW wins. I asked that because they have fought at that weight and are viewed as good victories for Froch. So rather than go on about Hagler or Pudwill, try and answer the question if you want to quote me Not sure you understood or read the question Johnson and Mack were not great defenses and Johnson has lost more at SMW than won. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Once again the questions below that people struggle to answer This content is protected Can someone explain how Pascal, Dirrell, Taylor, Johnson, Mack are good SMW wins? They havent done anything at the weight. Nothing. Abraham isnt a top SMW either. I thought he lost the first fight to Steiglitz and then did lose the return and how many posts were on ESB saying Steiglitz was the worst champ etc. Many on here even said Bute was a fighter that never did anything and never stepped up and not a top champ. I actually think Frochs win over Bute was excellent, but just look at how people have changed their posting to suit. As said Bute was a top win and the first SMW champ that Froch beat, before that it was vacant titles. Now tell me how Pascal, Dirrell, Taylor, Johnson, Abraham, Mack are good SMW wins? Except for Abraham having a disputed and hard fought win over a fighter that many called the worst champ, The others havent done anything at the weight. Nothing. Remember how Sheika beat prime SMW Johnson to get a shot at the champ Calzaghe, which shows how the division has got weaker when in order for Froch to get a shot at champ Ward, he had to fight old, boiled down, past best Johnson that Sheika beat when prime. Thats should say everything Someone explain how the fighters listed are a better win than Reid, Woodhall, Veit 2, Lacy, Kessler, Eubank, Mitchell
Bailey , you that stupid or are you just trolling? Froch didn't have to beat Johnson to get a shot at Ward. Glenn was brought into the Super6 after Kessler and Green both bailed after getting their ass handed to them by Ward.....Johnson had 1 win before Froch ejected him. Johnson had only won 4 of his last 10 fights before Sheika beat him. He was losing to Ottke and nobody's - Merqui Sosa , Joseph Kiwanuka, Derrick Harmon. You fail as usual.
Bailey IS this stupid. I know some think he just trolls, but no. He really believes the garbage he posts.
They have ducked the post several times. They call me a troll for asking the question, yet truly do reveal their bias agendas by not being able to make a serious counter to the post
Froch had to beat Dirrell,Taylor, Arthur AND johnson to get to the final. What sort of a ****in **** thinks to get the the final of the Super6, all that was needed was to beat Glen Johnson ?? How was Johnson prime when Sheika beat him?. Its was Johnson's 4th straight loss in a row You haven't answered what Viet- who was unknown and only fighting 8-10 rounders did to earn a shot at Joe and why he was fighting bottom ranked Manfredo when Bute was ranked no.2 two in the division Why was Woodhall a good win when he had just lost his belt and was one fight away from reitement?
Do you know how a tournament works?? Johnson was brought in to replace Kessler after Ward demolished him , something Joe couldn't do. The points he earned got him into the final , not one win. The rest of your drivel is laughable and makes you look like a clown with no make up.