Why people get so emotional when Froch does something they think is arrogant is lost on me. Most boxers are arrogant, particularly in relation to how they think they would stack up against other fighters. It's part and parcel of getting in a ring for money and punching people and taking punches. Why does everyone act like a shocked spinster aunt about the whole thing? Froch may be a tit (I don't think so) and Groves may beat him (and I hope he does), but why such bad feeling from some towards him? In other news, some of you need to learn the difference between 'you're' and 'your'. ******ed, incorrect use of either offends me much more than Carl Froch being a bellend.
I see the Froch family sycophant Karl Beard (Boxing Legend) is having a go at SGG on Twitter,calling George a 'little boy' i really hope someone knocks that mug out,i can honestly see the Froch entourage getting attacked at Wembley.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/ot...041/Ricky-Hatton-shatters-viewing-record.html Pay per view on Sky Box Office • Ricky Hatton v Floyd Mayweather (2007) 1,000,000 + • Lennox Lewis v Mike Tyson (2002) 760,000 • Frank Bruno v Tyson (1996) 660,000 • Tyson v Evander Holyfield (1997) 550,000 • Tyson v Julius Francis (2000) 500,000 Pay per view in the US on HBO • Oscar De La Hoya v Mayweather (2007) 2.4 million • Tyson v Holyfield II (1997) 1.99 million • De La Hoya v Felix Trinidad (1999) 1.4 million