Froch vs Stevenson

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by TED 822, Nov 24, 2013.


Page 2 of 2
  1. lewishamboy

    lewishamboy Styles Impetuous Full Member

    9,101
    0
    Jul 15, 2007
    Stevenson would send Froch into retirement. I don't know how you can watch last nights fight and think Froch beats Stevenson
     
    lewishamboy, Nov 24, 2013
    lewishamboy, Nov 24, 2013
    #16
  2. TED 822

    TED 822 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,351
    234
    Jul 10, 2012
    Snap mate,much as I respect Froch.
     
    TED 822, Nov 24, 2013
    TED 822, Nov 24, 2013
    #17
  3. TED 822

    TED 822 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,351
    234
    Jul 10, 2012
    And you Furey.If we all thought the same,we wouldn't have a forum,mate.
     
    TED 822, Nov 24, 2013
    TED 822, Nov 24, 2013
    #18
  4. TED 822

    TED 822 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,351
    234
    Jul 10, 2012
    Hi Ruthlessone.You another one of the few.I was screaming at the TV but I bet you were really sick.Not as sick as Groves though,Ill bet.Really sorry for the lad.
     
    TED 822, Nov 24, 2013
    TED 822, Nov 24, 2013
    #19
  5. boxfanlut

    boxfanlut Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,672
    7
    Apr 4, 2012
    Froch is vunerable to orthodox fighters with the over hand right. Can't think of to many southpaws on froch ''fantastic resume''.
     
    boxfanlut, Nov 24, 2013
    boxfanlut, Nov 24, 2013
    #20
  6. a force 1989

    a force 1989 Member Full Member

    285
    0
    Jul 10, 2011
    Are we talking about at 168 or 175? Froch ain't moving up so I'm guessing 168?

    At 168 Froch beats him, Stevenson looks a lot better at 175, he's throwing more punches and has a lot better stamina and punch resistance. If he came back down he'd get stopped
     
    a force 1989, Nov 24, 2013
    a force 1989, Nov 24, 2013
    #21
Page 2 of 2