From 1990 and up what WW has a great chang'e at beating Hearn's

The same Tito that got taken to school by DLH?

 

ABSOLUTELY NO ONE!

Trinidad would last the longest if u really want an answer

 

I believe you're the one who actually is a moron

---- WTF has PBF done at 147 to make you think he would beat The Hitman?? You are truly Delusional and apparently have never actually boxed... The size advantage is just outrageous and don't think PBF has ever been in with someone with that kind of power and speed ( and length ) BLIND FAN

 

Agree with the first part,


Disagree with the second.



Trinidad's chin was a bit iffy now and again.

He was prone to being KDd early, getting up, getting pissed off and going on to win.

That wouldn't happen with the hitman.

If he was put down, it would be over.

And quickly.

 

Ya when I wrote It I was gonna change it, but it sounded funnier ..... Pernell would probably last the longest due to his elusiveness and defense... BUT I do think Trinidad would have the best chance against him... and by best chance I Mean 1% chance

 

Yep.

Trinidad would probably have the best chance.

I would give him about 10%.

 

I'd pay all the money in my bank account to have seen Tito-Hearns. I don't think Tito would win but it'd be insanely fun.

Pernell would probably have a decent chance depending on the number of chances he was willing to take in there.

 

excuse me but who do you think you are calling people you dont know idiots ? maybe you should give yourself a rest from looking in boxing encycolpedias and learn some manners.

i said mayweather would have the best chance of beating hearns, based on him being one of the three most talented boxers of the last 20 years. i didnt say he would beat him .

point is, dont call me an idiot.

 

that sums up everything i was gonna say...

 

Look you ****ing idiot, I am asking the poster who brought up Clottey as to how a deadlier version in Quartey would fare against Hearns and NOT that or how he would beat Tommy. You ****ing illiterate piece of ****, READ before assuming things. Stupid idiot.:-(

 

:nono1999 147lb Oscar has a MUCH better chance at beating Tommy and HIS chances are nil.

 

if his chances are nil he hasn't got a much better chance has he ? at least you didnt call people idiots though.

 

STFU you dont know **** stick to the Lounge dumb ass!!!

 

This most be a joke right???

 

OK, I was out of line. But look at it from a technical standpoint. Hearns was the ultimate stand-up boxer. His height, reach, reflexes, ability to dictate the range of the bout, and power made it basically impossible for any pure boxer up to perhaps MW to beat. Benitez was at his best against Hearns, and despite his phenomenal defense, was simply unable to get anything going offensively because of Hearn's power, offensive arsenal, speed, and range. A smaller fighter like Floyd, a natural 130 pounder, would have no chance. He's just not the type of fighter needed to take Hearns off his game. It would be very one-sided. I honestly can see no other outcome.