:yep If the age diff was close Wlad would almost surely win - most likely by KO. However since Wlad is pushing 40, this could be competitive.
Wlad wears shorts, you cannot see his muscular powerful titanium legs with him wearing those shorts :hey
That's not 3''. Wlad vs. Jennings you can see Wlad is more than 3'' taller than Jennings (Jennings is listed at 6'3). There is no way Fury is 3'' taller.
I'm pulling for Wlad, and expect him to win, but he definitely looked three full inches shorter than Fury
Tyson is obviously bigger. He represents a big threat to Vlad, but it's hard to bet against Klitschko. Let's stop arguing about inches....it's going to be a great fight. I am looking forward to it more than any other fight in years.
Of course he presents a huge threat to Wlad, his immense size is enough to collapse the ring after he receives a left hook to the chin, bringing Wlad down with him. :deal
Vlad would easily knock out Julius Long who is 7 feet tall, Vlad would easily knock out the 6 foot 10 inch Tye Fields, etc., being tall is not what it's all about, you have to use your height, fight every opponent differently. Marciano was only around 5 feet 10 inches, yet he was champion................Mike Tyson was short, but look what he did, etc., Vlad knows more about boxing than Fury ever will, hit's much harder, has balance, better footwork, has many different combinations and can knock Fury out with either hand...............
Reality check for people who argue Fury is bigger than Wach: https://postmediaprovince.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/klitschko-wach-2.jpg http://i4.mirror.co.uk/incoming/art...ATES/s615/Vladimir-Klitschko-v-Tyson-Fury.jpg
Ustinov is the same size, if not bigger than Fury (which is why Fury ducked him)....anyway Wlad trashed him in sparring. People making a big deal about Fury's height as a key to victory are idiots.