Fury reportedly declined 60-40 for the winner

'Oleksandr Usyk’s promoter Alex Krassyuk has told talkSPORT that Tyson Fury rejected their latest offer of a ’60/40 to the winner’ deal.'

[url]https://talksport.com/sport/boxing/1355183/oleksandr-usyk-tyson-fury-60-40-winner-deal/[/url]

Whoopsie-daisy. We learn Krassyuk's claim from a third person, Krassyuk himself, lol.

Quick, talk to your mates Leeroy84, Thunderstorm, miniq and Redbeard7 about what the next line of Operation DDD (Defend Da Duck) shall be. Maybe try to go with arguing how talkSPORT must be lying, Krassyuk surely never spoke to them?

 

I try not to have an opinion about these contract negotiations, but Fury's behavior is pretty unseemly.

 

Oh no, I just mentioned you again. What have I done! Just out of curiosity, if I type your name five times in a row, would you appear like Candyman? I like to live dangerously.

"Leeroy84, Leeroy84, Leeroy84, Leeroy84, Leeroy84,
show yourself and avenge Fury, your sweet lover boy!"

 

Changed the narrative.

Again: you clearly don't understand that offers and proposals have to be official for reasons, as they're never direct "60:40 for the winner", as in this case, but I see you capable of imaging it like a contract of few lines on one page. Now, being unable to show any intelligence yourself, you go to the point of involving other users, practically mentioning them as fools - you really are low.

 

Hate it or love it, boxing IS a business. And like with everything, the money you make is directly related to how much you generate. Couldn't stand Floyd Mayweather but he built his brand and deserved the highest payday almost every time. Fury with his antics had made himself known and Usyk is a nobody outside of boxing fans like us. Fury generates more so he should get more.

 

60/40 to the winner is more than fair, the winner takes a bigger cut.

HOW THE **** IS THAT NOT FAIR? You still get a massive payout even if you lose, and it gives you more incentive to train hard!!!

Perfectly fair deal.

 

Make no mistake, nobody knows Fury apart from boxing fans either. I don't know where this idea comes from that Fury is some sort of Ali or Tyson whom even those who couldn't care less about boxing have heard about but it's just nonsense. Heck, he is not even the biggest name in boxing today.

 

Fury found a "valid" reason for the fight not to take place, other fights should be arranged because there are good fighters out there, forget about Fury vs. Usyk, we will never see that fight because the sooner you accept it the easier it will be for you, Fury doesn't care about the loyal fans who desperately want to see that fight, give us Joyce vs. Usyk...

 

Bollocks, you are just moving the goalposts, mate. Up until now, it was 'oh, it is a third-party thing, Krassyuk might have never said it for all we know'. Now, when you fell flat on your face with that argument, it's suddenly 'oh, well, it still should be official' - whatever the hell you mean by that, as stating it publicly is as official as it can get. What, do you expect Krassyuk to post the contract draft on his IG? Would that be official enough for you?

I'm quite familiar with your type of poster, pate. You'd keep moving the goalposts ad nauseam in a true Fury fanatic style. It's scary to see that you guys are dead serious about this whole Gypsy King thing and act as his loyal vassals.

 

You care far more than me buddy, I'm only here for the entertainment.

Carry on for me clown.

 

Splits aren't based on potential performance. Every man and his dog expected Whyte to take a pasting off Fury. as it was an awful style match up for Whyte. But he was still top 5 with the Ring and WBC interim champion after being #1 for donkey's years.

People don't like Whyte. But it being Whyte who was getting screwed was never important. The issue was the depth of the WBC corruption. To pay any fighter in that position 18% was a disgrace after the years of sanctioning fees they received.

It was disappointing to see Team Fury leverage that against someone who he was apparently on good terms with.

In light of that, what chance has Usyk got of negotiating a deal in good faith!

 

Tyson Fumbles still weeping for 60:40 while fighting in his own backyard?

 

So no slashing victims with your prosthetic hook or anything like that then? Dissapointing

 

Fury don't want that smoke. Wilder 4 in the books.

 

Sure it's not the way how the money are given, my point was Whyte was overpricing himself too much at the beginning. Maybe he deserved a bit more than what he got, so was Usyk with Joshua for the first fight.

Otherwise, I don't know the general opinion how people look at Whyte, mine isn't bad.

Changing the narrative is what you usually do, it's there - you're going the childish way already.

To tell you from professional standpoint how and why a contract is issued and reworked, so I know that you've no idea why something has to be officially stated/written in full context.

As for what you're familiar - I doubt, one of the reasons is in the above paragraph, other is that you're from the Usyk sect and literally rush to argue and explain to everyone who simply doesn't favor your guru. And it's exactly the same thing that makes you lose any dignity and keep your BS posts, but they're all déjà-vu.