George Foreman vs. a peak Frank Bruno

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KOTF, May 20, 2013.


  1. BoxingFanPhil

    BoxingFanPhil Member Full Member

    330
    2
    Jan 29, 2013
    George Foreman would knock Frank out.
     
  2. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,661
    Jul 8, 2010
    Rock em sock em robots. Basically a battle of attrition. I take the fighter with the better chin and more proven temperament in big fights in Foreman. Not much real analysis to be done otherwise.
     
  3. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006

    He did, but I think he'd starch Frank before it came down to that.
     
  4. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Only 2 guys went the distance with Bruno, some guy called Phil Jackson and Oliver Mcall, the knocked the rest out
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Bruno would win the early rounds with the jab before Foreman catches upto him around the 7th or 8th
     
  6. heavy_hands

    heavy_hands Guest

    yes it would have been a real war, probably a trilogy like ali- frazier and holyfield-bowe :rofl
     
  7. salty trunks

    salty trunks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,740
    80
    Dec 22, 2009
    Bruno doesnt beat any version of Foreman.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
    Bruno wins in style.
     
  9. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,519
    1,675
    Aug 18, 2012
    Bruno has no chance. foreman by ko within 3 rounds. The very best Foreman and Bruno does not get past the initial round. Great fighter vs a contender.
     
  10. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Old George would not fight Bruno. Its as simple as that. Why, because old george was a great match maker. Second time around he knew he was giving away age and he was not prepared to give away anything else. If you look at who he picked for himself all he would give away was age, nothing else. Against frank hes giving away age, pace,punch rate and every thing else was equal like size power etc. Its a bad match so he would never take it. Foreman was sucha draw he could have had anyone but avoided Ruddock, lewis, bowe, bruno for a reson.

    Young George kills Bruno, unless its the one that fought lyle. Bruno was better than Lyle. The sheer belief undefeated Foreman had in himselfwould have been far too much for Frank who whilst brave was anxious at the best of times times in big fights.
     
  11. heavy_hands

    heavy_hands Guest

    what?
     
  12. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,661
    Jul 8, 2010
    One thing that might pose a problem for George is Bruno's overhand right, which he was tall enough to loop over Foreman's wide arm defence. Shorter fighters tended to get stymied by that, and lose all their power. Bruno could punch with full force.

    I still think Foreman wins, but if anyone could stun and knock him down, Bruno has a very good chance.
     
  13. castle

    castle Member Full Member

    138
    3
    Mar 5, 2006
    How did I forget about Mcall ,that was the only fight Bruno got caught with a couple of good ones late and managed to hang on
     
  14. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,705
    11,707
    Jan 6, 2007
    Frank has a little accident in his shorts during the staredown.
     
  15. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,705
    11,707
    Jan 6, 2007
    But seriously, Frank was very intimidated by Tyson.

    I think Big George was even more intimidating.

    Pre-Rumble George takes this one.

    Early.