Good wins that are often discredited for whatever reason

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Hookie, Oct 4, 2010.

  1. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,975
    Likes Received:
    9
    It is funny that those three boxers were picked. (not Pacman)
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    404,288
    Likes Received:
    86,375
    There's a reason for that.

    18 out of 20 experts were not polled by the Ring after seeing what Oscar looked like making weight.
     
  3. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Messages:
    32,127
    Likes Received:
    41
    18 out of 20 experts probably didn't count on De La Hoya being drained to the extent that he was the smaller man on the night and barely able to throw punches. Kinda hard to highly rate a win over what was essentially a heavybag.
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    28,695
    Likes Received:
    14,073
    Well, that I've picked Pac should tell you that I don't have an agenda. Leonard and Jones are probably those who have their victories questioned and nit-picked the most, and Pac's absolutely outstanding wins gets questioned to an absurd degree as well by many.

    If he had been active in the 30's or 40's, started out at flyweight and beaten the quivalent to the guys he have beaten, no one would nitpick as some do now. He would just be an absolute legend.
     
  5. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,255
    Likes Received:
    134
    Lewis Klitschko. "Klitschko would have won if it weren't for that damned Lewis landing accurate, damaging punches. THE EVENT WAS WON"
     
  6. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    20,862
    Likes Received:
    139
    Not only that Roach completely discredited his fighters win more by saying he saw blood dripping down Oscars arm from the IV. I couldnt believe he said that.
     
  7. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    20,862
    Likes Received:
    139
    This is a big one. :good If Vitalis face wasnt falling off he would have won. Hmm why was his face falling off?
     
  8. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    31
    All of Jermaine Taylor's fights before the Pavlik loses. He beat outstanding competition.

    He was on his way to having a better career than Hopkins.
     
  9. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,975
    Likes Received:
    9
    All are great boxers, Roy gets to much stick for fighting a green Hopkins, the rematch did not come off, I think it is more Hopkins fault than Roy's as he was the lesser draw, in a lower weight division and lost the first one. The Toney thing about being weight drained was not Roy's fault either.

    I cannot fault Pacman for anything, it is hard to clean out divisions when you go though 7 of them.

    Leonard is a sore spot cause I like Duran and Hagler more than him, one of the best boxers ever. The rest has been said to many times.

    Floyd is another story, seems to be getting worse.
     
  10. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Messages:
    32,127
    Likes Received:
    41
    :thumbsup
     
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    28,695
    Likes Received:
    14,073
    I don't follow the discussion about Floyd, really. Does his wins get underrated or overrated, you think?