Good wins that are often discredited for whatever reason

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Hookie, Oct 4, 2010.


  1. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,975
    9
    Apr 12, 2009
    It is funny that those three boxers were picked. (not Pacman)
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    402,538
    84,432
    Nov 30, 2006
    There's a reason for that.

    18 out of 20 experts were not polled by the Ring after seeing what Oscar looked like making weight.
     
  3. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    18 out of 20 experts probably didn't count on De La Hoya being drained to the extent that he was the smaller man on the night and barely able to throw punches. Kinda hard to highly rate a win over what was essentially a heavybag.
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,205
    13,214
    Jan 4, 2008
    Well, that I've picked Pac should tell you that I don't have an agenda. Leonard and Jones are probably those who have their victories questioned and nit-picked the most, and Pac's absolutely outstanding wins gets questioned to an absurd degree as well by many.

    If he had been active in the 30's or 40's, started out at flyweight and beaten the quivalent to the guys he have beaten, no one would nitpick as some do now. He would just be an absolute legend.
     
  5. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    Lewis Klitschko. "Klitschko would have won if it weren't for that damned Lewis landing accurate, damaging punches. THE EVENT WAS WON"
     
  6. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Not only that Roach completely discredited his fighters win more by saying he saw blood dripping down Oscars arm from the IV. I couldnt believe he said that.
     
  7. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    This is a big one. :good If Vitalis face wasnt falling off he would have won. Hmm why was his face falling off?
     
  8. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    1,866
    31
    Sep 24, 2010
    All of Jermaine Taylor's fights before the Pavlik loses. He beat outstanding competition.

    He was on his way to having a better career than Hopkins.
     
  9. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,975
    9
    Apr 12, 2009
    All are great boxers, Roy gets to much stick for fighting a green Hopkins, the rematch did not come off, I think it is more Hopkins fault than Roy's as he was the lesser draw, in a lower weight division and lost the first one. The Toney thing about being weight drained was not Roy's fault either.

    I cannot fault Pacman for anything, it is hard to clean out divisions when you go though 7 of them.

    Leonard is a sore spot cause I like Duran and Hagler more than him, one of the best boxers ever. The rest has been said to many times.

    Floyd is another story, seems to be getting worse.
     
  10. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    :thumbsup
     
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,205
    13,214
    Jan 4, 2008
    I don't follow the discussion about Floyd, really. Does his wins get underrated or overrated, you think?