I already explained exactly why I thought Pavlik would win. Go back and check it out. Stylstic comparisons between Winky and B-Hop, however tenuous, aren't valid.
yo shut the **** up dog... who are you? creep back into your hole and fall back.. i aint say **** to you.... shut that **** up
im keeping it real.... tell this dude to hop off my dick.... i didnt even type him.... everyone a ****ing key board warrior on a forum
They are not only not valid, they're plain ridiculous. It is actually the type of thing that let's you know if your are dealing with a knowledgable poster. McKart is the only previous Pavlik opponent who compares to Winky. Since he lost to Winky 3 times, he's obvously not as good, but very similar style, similar size-slightly bigger, shell defense, likes to counter punch, southpaw, very durable, et.
Yeah I checked it out and it made zero sense. Since Winky is not Rubio which I do recall you mentioned in one of your past post. And Kelly Pavlik is sure as hell no Paul Williams. Kelly does not have the speed to catch Winky. Power and volume doesn't mean ****. If you can't touch your opponent. Winky has shown terrific movement in his past fights against Mosley and even in his fight with Taylor. Seeing how Bernard was so effective against Kelly with that tactic I see Winky pulling it off.
i respect that opinion that winky would win against pav so long as you would give pav credit if he ***** slapped winky into a late round tko and not say it wasnt the same winky that fought tito :deal
I give credit where credit is do. Unlike some other people around who make excuses and cry. When their favorite fighter loses. I'd give Kelly all the credit in the world if he beats Wright. In fact I don't even like Wright. But my boxing brain is telling me he can beat Pavlik.
atta boy :good b/c i would actually like to see this fight...i always have. and i know pwilly looked like he would have beat winky even if winky didnt have "ring rust" (i would imagine winky would have been more competitive if he had an easier fight before the pwilly fight) but i would expect winky to be more competitive in general if he and pav fought. i just know we would hear **** about winky being shot or being pwill's leftovers or a shadow of what he was against tito when i think he has some fight left in him.
Based on these comments I do not believe for one minute that you saw either Pavlik/Taylor fight, and I doubt if you watched Taylor/Wright unless it was on some shitty internet stream. Taylor jabbed the **** out of Winky. Pavlik essentially beat Taylor with his jab TWICE in two different divisions. You are right about one thing: Pavlik is no Paul Williams. You would never see Quintana dominate KP round after round after round.
Saw Pavlik/Taylor 1 and Pavlik/Taylor 2. All those fights showed me was that Taylor had crappy defense. Something that is stupid to do against a power puncher like Pavlik. Winky is not that stupid. I also saw Wright/Taylor and if your telling me Taylor dominated that fight than your the one who needs to have his eyes examined. Fight was a draw in case you forgot. And the only one in that fight that looked beat up was Taylor. His right eye was closed shut thanks to Winkys jab. If Pavlik beat Taylor than why didn't he beat B-Hop(who lost to Taylor twice). See thats where your theory loses its credibility. Thats why I never base my prediction on past fights. I only based it on styles. Styles make fights if you haven't heard.