I voted for Pac but have only seen 2 Hamed fights in their entirety. One of which was against Barrera:nut
I was thinking this , Hamed has more 1-punch ko power at 126 , Pacman has carried great power throughout divisions though , but is more of an accumulation puncher. However , if you look at pac at 122 , he had great, great 1-punch ko power. Very hard to decide , but i still pick naz though
those were his two best knockouts, also the kayo of Vazquez was nuts. The alicea one was just insane. First knockdown, it took 3-4 seconds for Alicea to realize that he just rocked out of his mind from a shot to the temple.
Hamed. He was a freak of nature his power was incredible. Such a wasted talent, if he had stayed with Ingle and wan't a complete ******* he would have gone down as an ATG without question.
pac also have that one shot power at the lower weights. http://youtube.com/watch?v=jJ0_WHKi7W4 he carried his power all the way to 130 (and possibly 135) through elite opposition so i don't see hamed having greater power by a distance.
He also starched tough journeymen like Angeles who went the distance with Morales. His KO of Liendo was one of the most savage you will see and if it is a top KO list the uppercut that nearly killed Boom Boom Johnson is right up there.
The question is not so clear. Are we talking about Naz and Pac at 126 or are we talking about their best weight? Pac is a destructive force at 122 but it seems that we are comparing only their 126 performance. Which is which? Also, to be fair (and so as not to show your disdain for Pac), make another option for Hamed nuthuggers who cannot vote against Hamed.
****, i meant to vote for Naz....To many Pacquiao buttons man it was like 2-1 odds that I would **** that poll up man, Its a ****ing conspiracy man!!!