Hagler talks Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by yesihavearm2, Nov 11, 2008.


  1. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    I don't see it. I don't see any reason why Tarver should be a fight Calzaghe should pursue. I don't see it being particularly meaningful--Tarver has no titles, although if it got made he would find a way to get that IBO strap he always seems to have--and I don't see anything in Tarver's style that would make it a particularly exciting fight; If Hopkins and Dawson could back Tarver up, I don;t see Joe having any sort of difficulty. I'm actually a fan of Tarver, I like his style and the way he promostes his fights, but I just don't see this as being any benefit to anyone except Tarver, who gets a fat payday and a chance to land another lucky punch.
     
  2. olyalex

    olyalex Manos de piedra Full Member

    1,387
    0
    Jul 11, 2008
    I think Marvin Hagler shood fight Tarver, and i'm shore he will win...lol
     
  3. box3r86

    box3r86 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,506
    1
    Feb 8, 2008
    does dawson not have a rematch with tarver?
     
  4. jlmayo825

    jlmayo825 Active Member Full Member

    534
    0
    Oct 1, 2007
    isnt he from the same area (Northeast) as Chad Dawson???? so wouldnt he know that Chad beat Tarver? ha idk calzaghe-tarver is a joke
     
  5. henrik

    henrik fasthands Full Member

    2,816
    0
    Oct 1, 2006
    nomatter who joe calzaghe faces,there will allways be a new opponent waiting.He will allways have fans and critics,even haters.
    IF he fought Dawson and Tarver,and won that wouldnt change that fact.
    Joe Calzaghe should IMO retire now,undefeated.With a great record AND nothing left to prove...the man is 37,have had a lot of handinjuries and
    should call it a day.
     
  6. berserkafied

    berserkafied Active Member Full Member

    683
    0
    Jun 3, 2008
    Good point..I hate 'the rematch clause'. However I think Tarver would gladly step aside if the $$ was right!
     
  7. denilo

    denilo Member Full Member

    316
    0
    Sep 28, 2007
    Yes my friend, there are two kinds of posters in this world, those who speak in dichotomies and those who doesn´t :D
     
  8. thehitman

    thehitman italian dragon Full Member

    264
    0
    Jun 2, 2008
    you must be the biggest **** on this forum
     
  9. denilo

    denilo Member Full Member

    316
    0
    Sep 28, 2007


    Thats an early call, quite stiff competition I would say:nut
     
  10. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    Yea nevermind Johnson, or Dawson.....****ing idiot
     
  11. kinski

    kinski Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,645
    13
    Apr 29, 2006
    Tarver is shot,also.
     
  12. Caliboxing

    Caliboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,203
    4,556
    Sep 28, 2007
    Maybe Hagler is being sarcastic because those are the kinds of fighters that Calzaghe is going for now. A Tarver fight makes no sense right now. Johnson and Dawson are the only ones worth fighting at 175.
     
  13. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    I think Hagler mentioned Tarver due to what he did to Roy. Tarver is probably going to get his rematch with Dawson. What if.......Tarver wins.
     
  14. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Tarver ? Is the Marvelous one on the Tarver payroll ? Did Hagler miss the Dawson fight ?
     
  15. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    123,179
    35,354
    Jun 23, 2005
    Tarver???? Is Hagler on the payroll?