Hagler vs Julian Jackson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Longhhorn71, Sep 23, 2010.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,434
    47,619
    Feb 11, 2005
    Does anyone here remember they weren't in the same division at the point they could have been matched?
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,307
    45,453
    Apr 27, 2005
    I was keeping quiet on that one :lol:
     
  3. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    The Marvin who fought Mugabi had been off for a year and had his nose broken in sparring a half a year before, postponing the fight. Then he was not sparring much and looked soft and rusty in the fight with Mugabi. Marvin for Mugabi was not sharp at all. The last fight which Marvin looked good and was active and sharp was Hearns. Jackson in there with an active Marvin who was in shape gets stopped early enough. Mugabi would have lasted only 3 or 4 with an in shape Marvin.
     
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    styles make fights. Saying Jackson does as good as Mugabi is assuming Jackson fights the same inactive Hagler that Mugabi fought. If Jackson fought the pumped up Hagler which Hearns fought different story all together.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,307
    45,453
    Apr 27, 2005

    Hagler wasn't inactive vs Mugabi. They went at it pretty hard and Mugabi's success and power led Hagler to step back and box.

    That's my memory of it, if it's wrong i'll have to rewatch - been a while :lol: