Mayweather would not have lost one minute of one round. Complete and utter domination/humiliation, a 12-round shutout. Floyd was far too big, too quick, and too skilled for someone like Hamed.
Naseems speed would give lil Floyd some trouble here, but Floyd would adapt after some rounds and beat him bad. Floyd is hard to hit, too skilled and technically sound for Naseem
Nobody and i mean NOBODY hit harder than Prince Naseem in featherweight history.. and he was fast..he could definatly do damage but would he land on floyd? I doubt it. Hamed was also put down several times. It would be dangerous for mayweather early on but after that floyd susses Hamed out and it ends probably like the corrales fight...with about 6 or 7 knockdowns. Mayweather was vicious at 130 and altogether a better smarter fighter
:dealThis. Kevin Kelly had Hamed down 3 times. Once Floyd worked him out after 3 or 4 rounds it would become an ass whooping
I remember Naz responding to this by saying something like "How many more times do they want me to move up?" The physical differences would have been huge, and it would have been a complete mismatch. Hamed was a midget for a featherweight, he was effectively a bantamweight choosing to fight at a higher weight. It's not too different from asking the Floyd Mayweather of today, to fight a prime 160 Roy Jones Jr.
Floyd always likes to take a look for the first few rounds, like James Toney, so saying he wouldn't lose one minute is stupid.
in the press conference, i would say a close fight but hamed takes it in the fight, won't be close. floyd by tko. though hamed's power must not be taken for granted
Mayweather would have stopped Naz & Naz knew it, the fight never happened for a reason. If Barrera can bag 8 rds vs Hamed, Mayweather would have bagged 12.
It's stupid to suggest a 5ft 3in tall, slower fighter with no defence and no jab and who does not have a high workrate would be able to compete with prime Floyd Mayweather... and I'm not even a Mayweather fan. Did Floyd "take a look" for the first few rounds vs Angel Manfredy? Juan Manuel Marquez? Arturo Gatti? Jose Luis Castillo? Diego Corrales? Nope. What is stupid is pretending one single fight (Zab Judah) is how Mayweather fought for his whole career when it quite obviously wasn't.
Hard to say IMO, Hamed had a great chin and great reflexes. He also has the power to back up his talks. Mayweather was good as well. He defense was great. I doubt anyone will be able to KO each other though.
It's not hard to say. You just don't understand boxing. Hamed would have been a midget in the ring with mayweather, his uneven balance would have seen hamed get knocked down several times in the fight. The fight wouldn't even be close.
This is really not a matter of opinion. Yeep you're right. I don't know anything about boxing. :rofl It's not like Hamed got KD because he was hurt or anything. Even morons such as yourself have their own opinion. If you think Mayweather wins this easily then that's your opinion. I respect that.