Haney vs Lomachenko judged by Artificial Intelligence

How does AI differentiate between for example a fighter flicking their jabs as opposed to throwing standard jabs?

 

Sounds like anything harder then a jab?

 

Probably analyzes commentary… lol

 

I did

 

There were a few big fights he got correct. For instance:
Moretti scored the first Golovkin vs Alvarez 115-113 for Golovkin. But as the years go on, he is throwing out more and more BS cards.
I honestly believe he is just inept. Saying he is corrupt and paid off would give him more credit he deserves. He just sucks at his job, that´s how low I think of him.

 

We Aussies will never forgive him for stiffing Jeff Fenech 30 years ago when he punched Azumah Nelson’s head in for 12 rounds and didn’t get the decision which would have made him a 4 division world champion.

It was one of the biggest robberies in the history of professional sport.

 

lol and the sad part is that statement is true

 

You know whats sad about all this?? It wouldn't be needed if you could find 4 honest unbiased officials, ref & 3 judges, to officiate every fight. The State Commissions do not seem to care, They must see some of the absolutely unbelievably, ludicrous scorecards , that have been presented & the horrendous referee performances. Yet they NEVER do their job & drag the culprits in to ask them to explain & ferret out the bad ones. It seems as though all theyre concerned with is making $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

 

I think you may get a post from Olu G Rotimi he claims to be a relative of the great Azumah Nelson

 

A lot of these punches were blocked.

 

Can you read or interpret data? It says Loma won 8-1 with 3 close rounds. That is a robbery.

 

Thankfully AI is not the official judging. Haney won end off.

 

The judges scored it for Haney, but the reality is that Haney was soundly outboxed by someone 15 pounds smaller.

 

There is an old saying, you know, that a good big man beats a good little man, that two good medium men often beat each other off, and that a good little man beats a good littler man unless that good littler man happens to get the odd win. You know that old chestnut, and it is one of the true aphorisms of our time.