yeah and I never said that it was some unbelieveable crime to say that on them condition's , so why you making out my ranking is some unbelieveable nosense when it is clearly not on my conditions, thats what I want too now, you guys been calling me narrow-minded when all I've done is defend my case, yet you guys are trying push yours opinions on me,
I questioned your logic, that was all. I didn't find it convincing, which is why I chimed in. Rank Saddler higher if you really want to, I don't care. I can see this is going nowhere, and I'm pooped. Gonna smoke a cig and hit the sack. I'll chat/argue with you guys tomorrow.
I agree with El Bulja. It appears to me you put heavy stock into the victories over pep while completely neglecting important values like longevity, dominance, consistency, resume, common opponents...all which pep score higher than saddler in.
and what wrong with that logic, you've admitted yourself that Pep was on form, so thats means Saddler stopped an on form Pep three times, yet me ranking Saddler over Pep is illogical, your full of **** there,
ive been reading this hoping to see some cool posts. wow did this get sidetracked fast. can't you guys start a pep v saddler thread to argue in and let this be about what the thread starter intended it to be?
And I understood that from the beginning, thats why I understand your rankings, but there's nothing wrong with ranking Saddler over Pep, I've just been defening my ranking
"I try to get out, but they keep pullin' me back in." Again, you've missed the point of my argument no matter how many times I've explained it. You rank Saddler higher because he bested a past prime (but still great) Pep 3 out of 4 fights, 2 of them in questionable fashion, to my eyes at least. I rank Pep higher because of the points myself and Suzie Q have brought up ad nauseam, which I consider to be more fair all things considered. Re-read them if you wish, I'm really not trying to have another round-about.
yeah and I don't give a **** about your ranking, I never questioned your ranking, but you guys started acting like a couple of bitches and started ridiculing me about something thats is reasonable, given my points, you guys are the one's that have kept this **** up, I was'nt gonna post again in this thread till you guys started having go, I never careed about your ranking in the first place, I let people have there own opinion's instead of pushing my one's on them, unlike you two
Well, ****. I just posted a response that didn't go through, apparently. Oh well, just chalk it up to differing opinions and we'll talk no more of it.
well why the **** did'nt you do that in the first place instead bitching for 4 pages, I said in the first that my opinion was and you to started having go (look at page 1), I like to have debates but you guys are just narrow-mind why the **** ask if your already got your mind closed