Has Joke Calslappy's opponents been nobodies? Or does he just make them look like ..

Why should he give a detailed retort if you didn't bother giving anythin gin detail yourself. This is all you wrote.

6 losses? And you think you're the unbiased poster here?

 

Since you were laughing, you must have disagreed to my claims, with a distinct knowledge of what to counter.

But I can see from your way of arguing that you are really not worth my time.

 

I think Kessler would beat Pavlik, but I don't see what that has to do with Joe and Pavlik.

 

Dude...you seem to want to hold people to a level YOU do not hold yourself to. You expected Yodaddy to give a detailed explanantion when you didn't even do so. And when he callls you on it, you pull this uppity "Not worth my time" ****? :roll:

 

Why would I need to detail it, when I don't know, if he is gonna reply to it. Sadly he opted the smiley. And therefore he ends the discussion.

Nobody is unbiased.

 

A guy who choses to write GAH-BAGE is really not an adult, and therefore not worth my time.

 

Does this actually make sense to you? Like i said, you expect detail but won't give any? Makes you look like a hypocrite. Amsterscram used to pull this same ****. Except he would be GONE when asked about details.

You can bet your ass I am a LOT more unbiased then you. I leave emotion out of these. You certainly do not.

 

Sure....look for any reason you want to justify yourself.

But you're SUCH an adult that you make belittling, condescending remarks like: "Nice retort. Counterargue me please. Or doesn't boxrec give you the answers?"
and then play the high and mighty "I'm an adult" roll? :roll:

 

Calzaghe has 20+ defenses to his name while KP has 1 defense of his middleweight strap against a journeyman. Jeff lacy had already defended his ibf title 4 times in impressive fashion and kessler was a unified champ before they fought JC. That's already more than Pavlik has accomplished at middleweight.

 

If he did reply, I expected him at least to ask, but he didn't - all he did was bolding out, and put a smiley. That is not a discussion. Why am I explaining discussion fundamentals with someone who has been around for a while?

This is your biggest problem Lance. You don't see that you do exactly what you accuse people of. I have been in several debates with you, where you were just as biased toward the other fighter. Hopkins, Taylor, Calzaghe and Pavlik just to name a few. Even your hatred of Amsterdam is full of bias.