Hatton = Fraud

Your making sense, stop it. If Hatton is a fraud then why are people saying this win over Hatton solidify his greatness?

And its only $50 dollars. let it go.

 

lofl lofl lofl

Nice vitriol. A little harsh but there is an element of truth to it. Well done! :yep

 

Was Joe Frazier a "fraud" because he was drilled by George Foreman in two rounds? Frazier and Hatton both had similar styles and careers, and they both belong in the HOF!!!!

 

This content is protected

:deal

 

Well thats a bloody good comparison? For ****s sake! :roll: Did Frazier have a career even similar to Rickys? Did you miss his trilogy with Ali? Did you also miss his bouts with Quarry Foster Ellis Bugner etc? Honestly how the **** you manage to find a comparison between Frazier loosing to Foreman and Hatton to Pac is beyond me. Frazier NEVER HAD GLARING HOLES IN HIS GAME. Frazier is a hall of famer/ATG that fought against the very best of his time. Seriously sign out and find another ****ing sport to watch you dolt. This is becoming infuriating. I never read such dribble in all my life. Similar ****ing careers? Honestly you should be banned forever for such a stupid post.:twisted:

 

Reg this is the similar course of diatribe with these Hatton zealots. When they cannot argue there point or see light of day as logic would dictate they resort to insults and littering their posts with "ha ha". Dont waste your time.

 

Right he got leathered but that doesn't mean he was a fraud.

 

Joe Frazier

Signature win=Ali I

Other notable wins=Quarry 2x, Bonavena 2x, Ellis 2x, Foster, Jones (Joe Bugner was never an elite heavyweight)

Losses=Foreman 2x, Ali 2x


Ricky Hatton

Signature win=Tszyu

Other notable wins=Phillips, Tackie, Maussa, Urango, Collazo, Castillo, Lazcano, Malignaggi

Losses=Mayweather, Pacquiao



They are not that far apart in terms of accomplishments, they fought with the same pressure style, and they both got hit a lot! Yes, Joe Frazier DID have holes in his game it doesn't mean he wasn't a great fighter. He had a tendency to fight like a one handed fighter and he was always a slow starter.


Check your facts and think before you respond next time!!!!!

 

Note the demographic is also between 14 and 20...

 

I dont need to. Only an idiot would find a comparison between Hatton and Frazier. And for the record go and watch Parkinson when he interviewd Ali and see what Ali himself had to say about Joe Bugner. Your post was nothing more than aimless drivel. Il always take the FACTS and Ali's words over yours thats real.

 

hattons not a fraud but he aint great either....

he is a good tough fighter just below the elite....

 

He is implying you have a small dick.

With regards to the title, its a ridiculous thing to call a fighter. Hatton is a good fighter who was maybe in the right place, at the right time, with the right style to beat an elite in Tzsyu.

He has still managed to rule 140 for 4 years, beaten some good 140 pounders, including multiple titlists and former titlists. At the weight he is very strong, and he is a good fighter who prior to fighting Pac was borderline top 10 P4P. He is NOT a fraud, and its just a pointless and baseless thing to call a proven fighter who comes up short against the very best in the world.

Sven Ottke. Now there is a fraud. But Hatton is not one.