Hatton = Fraud

Fraud is too strong a term IMO but I agree with the underlined part

 

Forget about his loses, where he was completely outclassed, then yes his level of opposition is average.

Oh yes he unified the 140 division fighting Urangos and Malignagis, he's an ATG lol

 

It would appear that it is you who is getting upset, Big Boy :hey

Your statement is just plain ridiculous.

No professional boxer is a fraud.

You however, are an internet warrior calling a professional boxer a fraud because you're pissed off that the fight only lasted 2 rounds and therefore you feel you didn't get your money's worth.

Let me guess - you sat at home alone and didn't have any friends to come over and help split the cost of the PPV?

I thought so :yep

However, Big Boy, I would like you to extrapolate on your 'fraud' theory...you've consistently referred to Hatton as a Gatti-level fighter throughout this thread. Answer me this then...

Why did PBF fight Gatti if Gatti was such a fraud? PBF called him a C level fighter before the fight, and Gatti looked like an amateur in there. The only difference between the 2 fights is that PBF didn't have the power to stop him in 2 like Pacman did Hatton.

Did you feel ripped off about that fight too, or did you feel you got your money's worth because:

a) it lasted 6 rounds
b) it involved PBF, and anything involving PBF just makes your labia glisten?

Or maybe you weren't even following boxing then?

 

Tosser

 

I think you've highlighted your own problem perfectly here. You can only categorise boxers as either 'ATGs' or 'Frauds'. Probably you could work on that.

 

Anyone who comes on here and suggest Hatton is a fraud, is a ****ing ****** and has no right to express thier lame opiniom. Sure he isnt that great when it comes to boxing skills, but he has done a good job of making a success of what works for him.

I would challenge anyone in here to get in with a fighter of his lvl and last.

Noone who has the balls to train and get in the ring expecially at that lvl can be called a fraud.

Anyway, a fraud is only a fraud, if your stupid enough to fall for it.

 

Hatton is like an English version of ODLH (without, say, 4 more weight division titles): Great until he gets to a certain level of class, and then the wheels fall off and you mark down another "L."

To be fair, he lost to two great fighters. But still, you have to tell it like it is. Pac completely tore Hatton apart, and I don't think if Hatton fought a perfect fight it would have been a lot different.

 

you can't compare Ricky Hatton to Oscar de la Hoya. Its NOT the same level. Not even close.

 

No, it's not. That's true. Just using a point of comparison: When they fight the best, you can be sure they'll come out with the "L" (at least for some time with Oscar).

ODLH >>>>>>>> Hatton, no doubt about that.

 

It would be nice to dig up the "pac is scared of hatton" threads when pac refused to sign because of purse splitting.

Now everyone is saying hatton is a fraud? just ****in hilarious. he lost to the #1 p4p no shame in that

 

actually i was saying Hatton was a fraud before the fight. But even then i didn't think he'd be on his ass in under a minute. And BigReg has been proclaiming Hatton's fraudulence for a while, when morons were still claiming that Hatton was clearly a better fighter than Mosley

 

Who mentioned ATG?:huh As someone above has said he's not elite but he's been a decent enough world champion and certainly no fraud.

 

Many of his nuthuggers claimed he was.
But my point is his resume is very average for all the hype he was getting.