SO HE IS TO BE TREATED SPECIAL IS WHAT YOUR SAYING! BECAUSE HE'S HATTON I DID'NT SEE ANYTHING TO MAKE ME FEEL CORTEZ DID A BAD JOB.
you culd clearly see a change in hattons strategy and attack after the point deduction,he lost it and inevitably lost the fight for himself because of his mental breakdown.if u couldnt see how cortex was influencing that fight you really need to watch it again,ill admit pbf was a much better fighter late on,but with joe in his corner he could walk through any inside fighter.
So its OK for the ref to **** him over is it? Every fighter who is a big underdog in a fight can be targeted by the ref, as they have no chance anyway? I am not blaming Cortez for Hatton's loss, he was outclassed, but to say its OK for Cortez to favour Floyd just because Ricky is outta his depth is just plain stupid.
No, Not Treated Special, Treated Fairly. Everytime Hatton Got On The Inside, Cortez Would Break Them Up, He Didn't Give Them The Chance To Throw Punches. At One Point In The Second Round, Hatton Rocked Mayweather With A Left Hook, Went To Follow Up On The Punch And The Ref Stepped In Between Them!!
So The Fix Was In Thats What Everybody Saying. I Dont Think So. Hey If You Let A Ref Get In Your Head That Your Problem You Adapt If You Can Which He Could'nt And Loss Fair In The Square.
Nobody Mentioned A Fix, Just That The Ref Was Very Poor. Hatton Relies On Inside Fighting, If The Ref Stops You From Doing This, Then It's Hard To Adapt And Then Try To Outbox The Best Boxer In The World!
umm....no. mayweather was throwing check hooks all night...he almost dropped hatton with one in the eigth round. it's completely absurd to notion that the ref caused hatton to lose. mayweather outclassed him all night long.
This content is protected Cortez didn't do ****, it was the 2 hit super combo between Mayweather and the turnbuckle that did Hatton in. :deal