Hatton will beat Pac with relative ease!

u didnt answer my question did u besides the fact im sure hatton puts a good 10 pounds on after weigh in anyway so that comment was a bit stupid wasnt it???????????atsch

 

you do realise that Britain never once asked for the USA's help dont you? Churchill actually made a point of doing this, I can get a quote if you want? Where as the USA did ask for Britains help in Afganistan, Iraq x 2 and did beg for help in Vietnam didnt you!

 

one punch he can throw with speed but pacman aint dumb enough 2 stay around and find out what the next one feels like:nut

 

pacman will fire off combos as soon as hatton thinks about putting weight behind his punchesatsch

 

really? then find one time the British asked for help during WW2! Go find a quote from churchill asking for American help.

So you didnt ask for our help in Vietnam, Afganistan or Iraq?

 

You're just upset over that because your Dad was a ***** :deal

 

:good:good:good:good

:good:good:good:good

 

you know vietnam was like 40 years ago dont you? Blair would have been like 10

 

Chris John beat Marquez "decisivley."

 

:rofl Don't comment on a fight you didn't see! And by that word alone it proves you didn't. It was a close fight. I saw it for JMM but Chis did very well. I thought JMM looked a bit off from his normal self and Chris looked extra good. But havin it for Chris is in no way a robbery....and vise versa. And sorry bro...one fight that is contraversail doesn't over shadow a career that spans over a decade of outstanding accomplishment and credentials in a sport like boxing.

 

..............................

 

????????????????????????????????????

 

:nut

 

Even though you made a huge mistake here no one should deny that you called the Calzaghe/Lacy fight well enough and with logical explanations. That erases the wrong prediction in this thread easily. :yep

 

What an idiot...