Oh FFS - you seriously cannot read. I presented the article I wrote as a balanced example in counter to Laz and Elvis' comments. Neither Uzi or Grant once said I was biased - they said it was clear from my posts that I favour Haye. Which I do and have never denied. But bias would require me to actively IGNORE anything which contradicts my argument. And considering I openly acknowledge that Haye's as much to blame as Wlad it's pretty hard to really say I'm biased. Unless you're an idiot. Which you are, Robert. And, since we're talking bias, one of the key factors in determining it is the use of selective evidence. And you cut both Grant and Uzi's comments to remove what didn't suit your argument: You're right - HE DID SAY I WAS... Oh wait, he didn't. So, neither of them said anything that actually agreed with your point. All they said is that I defend Haye, which doesn't automatically make me biased. But the way you presented those quotes clearly shows you are. Finally, all Laz did was ask for me to show him an article I wrote, and he hasn't commented since. So basically, all you've got is the opinion of a total Haye-hater to back your spurious, ill-considered point. Well done.
no, fighting audley and THEN fighting audley as if you are mimicking audley bar 2 barrages... is as careful as you can get!