Haye is too small for HW

what a **** thread, Haye is 6'3 with an 81" reach... that's a bigger reach than Wlad, so hardly small. Some right ******s on here

 

Haye is about the same size as George Foreman in his prime (slightly heavier and slightly shorter). That isn't too small for a heavyweight.

 

Bill poster = Idiot without any knowledge of boxing.:good

 

Why IS he a dick ?

And most top 15 heavyweights currently are bums are they not?


You only have to watch fights of most heavyweight bouts over the last
few years


Now Klitshko aint really a bum but considering he is THE MAN at heavyweight his last fight was a disgrace to boxing , simple as that.
And if you'd rather see fights like that from the heavyweight champion rather than the kinda fights Haye normally serves up then its you who is stupid don't you agree ?



actually you don't need to agree, its already plainly obvious.

 

Because it was ****ing awful, and awful fights arent something world champions should be serving up, they should be setting the standard , and if every fight was like that, no one would watch or go to boxing bouts, and then you would end up having no ****ing boxing whatsoever, because the public dont like paying to watch ****.


So for someone to say they actually preferred that fight to say, Haye v Thompson, Haye v Mormeck, Haye v Macerenelli can only mean they are obviously a bit dim, but never mind, Im not saying you're the only idiot on this fien planet

 

:thumbsup

I denied myself the chance to sleep off a hangover to watch that fight, what a ****ing waste of time!

 

Dude, someone posted all the champions of the same height and reach as Haye and you still spew that ****? Give it up or people are going to call you a troll.:tired

 

They should put the clown in the lounge :deal

 

6'3" and 220lb too small for a heavyweight? ****, someone better tell Ali.

 

You said it first... but copy me on that!:rasta