Haye is too small for HW

A few pints and kebab meat pizzas can cure that!

Ask Ricky Hatton artytime

 

We should say :****off

 

Don't forget Amir Khan either.

 

That would depend on his undrained weight. Also, wingspan is not necessary representative of breadth; someone can have long arms but not broad shoulders.

 

Where do you idiots get this sh*t from? Haye's reach is 78", Wlad's reach is 81". Stop making stuff up!

 

Whatever the size of the fighter, if he can compete against bigger opponents, what's the big deal?

And what's this NATURAL heavyweight thing? There is no such thing in my opinion.

It's not because there are monsters in the division, that smaller HW are not natural HW. You said Haye can't compete at HW because he's not a natural HW. What I am saying is, he's 6'3, he can easily compete with someone 3 inches bigger then him (Klit).

Anyways, I can't argue with you. It's your opinion, even if it's a stupid one.:good

 

It depends on his build numbnuts.

If he's built like Tyson, he's be a HW, if he's built like Hearns he'd be a welter.

 

Ok, here are some fighters from this era;

Samuel Peter = 6'0 1/2 reach 77''
Ruslan Chagaev = 6'1 reach 74'' (Didn't he beat Valuev???)
Alexander Povetkin = 6'2
John Ruiz = 6'2 reach 78''
Sultan Ibragimov = 6'2 reach 76''
Oleg Maskaev = 6'3 reach 79''
Lamon Brewster = 6'2 reach 77''
David Haye = 6'3 reach 78''

Want me to continue?

And I took some of the best HW in the lot.

Now STFU!! :rasta

 

Haye is probs the best defensive fighter of all Heavyweights.