Wait, so someone is a **** for coming on a boxing forum and posting vertbatim quotes from a fighter hyping the biggest heavyweight fight in years? :huh You've got issues
I see it going two ways. Haye catches Wlad very early and cold like Sanders, which is very possible considering Wlad has been defending his titles against subpar opponents for a while. He hasn't fought an opponent like Haye who, despite obvious flaws, has a crunching and devastating mix of power and speed. Or alternatively it goes down the most likely route of a boring late TKO after Haye gets his head jabbed off after a few moments of success in the early rounds and conman Booth steps in. :rasta
Haye has yet to show us any reason to believe that he is better than Samuel Peter, Eddie Chambers, Ruslan Chagaev, Tony Thompson, Sultan Ibragimov, Lamon Brewster, Calvin Brock, Chris Byrd or a prime Monte Barrett, certainly not yet anyway. All or nothing for Haye this fight, a win against Wlad in july then he can enter the top 50 ever HW rankings.
Going to have to disagree, despite the age of John Ruiz I don't think Brewster, Brock, Byrd or Chambers could have blown him out of there as casually as Haye did. It's not a case of what he has done, it's the potential he has shown and he definitely has the style to beat Wlad, whether he'll do it is a completely different kettle of fishys :rasta
This thread is getting so tedious and boring,we even have dumb dipsh*ts using footage of amateur fights years ago to try and prove a point. I really think this is a 50/50 fight and a strong case can be made for either fighter to win or lose.Both have strengths and both have weaknesses.I cannot see either fighter pulling out now as too much money is on the line something that wasn`t there before. I think it comes down to gameplan and tactics and the one who sticks to his will be the winner.I dont think it will be a classic or exciting as both fighters deep down know this is their toughest challenge to date.