Not at all. Wlad won the fight. But it was far closer and far more competitive than most of you let on. Good big man beat good little man.
is that per compubrit? cause compubox had it totally different: http://www.***********.com/forums/view.php?pg=klitschko-haye-compubox please stop it with these "facts"
It's Haye's fault. You can't expect people give you any credit, if you spend your claiming the Klitschkos are **** and you will destroy wladimir and so on. I find some people to be a bit too spiteful, but thats just human nature.
I understand that, Haye did that to try to get Wladimir to come at him all guns blazing. The reason I posted this thread is it's very boring reading that Klitschko did this that and the other to Haye...when in reality he didnt.
I agree it was closer than most people say but Haye kept flailing and literally diving to the canvas stupidly Wlad won it clearly though
Haye was neutralized by Wladimir's game plan, but it was a better fight than some say it was. Wladimir won damn near every round, but some of the rounds were pretty close.
This is from British tv, after 5 rounds? Sure it's not 2 rounds? Compubox differs by like 150%, even on punches thrown! But the punchline is that for those 5 rounds he was kinda trying to win, Haye landed 4 punches per round, according to your stats. And you come here wondering why nobody is impressed with that effort
What? that was after 4 rounds. This is what your beloved compubox says after the full fight Jabs Klitschko Haye Landed 105 36 Thrown 376 171 Percent 28% 21% Power Punches Klitschko Haye Landed 29 36 Thrown 133 119 Percent 22% 30% Total Punches Klitschko Haye Landed 134 72 Thrown 509 290 Percent 26% 25% So a 1% difference in landed shots. An 8% difference in landed power shots for Haye and a 7% difference in jabs for Klitschko. Sorry to burst your bubble.
I dont know what you're looking at, Wlad's output through first 4 rounds per compubox: 9/29 11/46 11/43 8/48 That's double what your stating. But ok, with your clarification, Haye was landing 5 punches a round during his most competitive stretch :rofl
George Foreman also said : "Vitali was winning the fight. Lewis got lucky. There has to be a rematch!" He also said , Vitali is as good as any of the past champions.
I hadit 10-2 or 9-3 to Wlad I can't remember. I think if Haye had engaged more he would have ended up getting stopped.
So anybody that don.t agree with your lies is an idiot now?:rofl:nut Don't remmember any George Foreman scores mentioned anywhere, but the fraudulent British broadcast.