Hearn says brook v alexander is a ppv fight!!!

15 quid for for a 36 minute fight, 25 minutes of it are alexander clinching. No thanks.

 

Eddie Hearn is a ****, he learnt that from his old man. ****ing Leyton Orient scum.

 

Sky ****ed off PPV cos Haye bored the **** out of everyone a couple of times so why would they bring it back with a card headlined by Devon 'The Clinch' Alexander.

 

Hearn's stable isn't big enough for PPV yet in my opinion. I like the current set up with one main event, 2 decent undercard fights at British/European level then prospects. I prefer having shows like this every 2/3 weeks than poor cards weekly with Commonwealth title fights as headliners.

But moving to PPV would be a bad idea IMO. I'd only pay £15 for a card with Froch, Bellew, Brook & Frampton in meaningful fights in truth and if he did that, he'd be taking away headliners from future bills.

 

Undercard of Froch - Bute aint a bad shout at all.

 

It would need to be a hell of a card with dual main event to be PPV worthy.

Also wont be tuning in to Brook's next fight if it's not for either a title (against Alexander idealy) or against Khan

The title fight is the big one though despite all the talk of Khan and Hatton i want to see British fighters fighting in the states on the World stage, not back here all the time where its safe,

 

you can talk when you pretended to be a black kenyan and now a stani atsch

 

more so than pesscott v khan:yep

 

Khan Prescott was pretty bad, but Groves - Degale? The fight was for a british title for crying out loud! I guess I can't complain too much as I paid my 15 quid. But come on.

 

khan/salita, now thats 15quid well spent atsch

 

Yeah smog. But Salita was his mandatory and did we actually know that was going to happen? I certainly didn't see it coming.