Hearn says brook v alexander is a ppv fight!!!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by iron_chin, Oct 21, 2012.

  1. lost

    lost Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    3
    15 quid for for a 36 minute fight, 25 minutes of it are alexander clinching. No thanks.
     
  2. Bill C84

    Bill C84 Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2011
    Messages:
    10,219
    Likes Received:
    1
    Eddie Hearn is a ****, he learnt that from his old man. ****ing Leyton Orient scum.
     
  3. El Greeno

    El Greeno Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    2,192
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sky ****ed off PPV cos Haye bored the **** out of everyone a couple of times so why would they bring it back with a card headlined by Devon 'The Clinch' Alexander.
     
  4. JFT96

    JFT96 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    4,636
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hearn's stable isn't big enough for PPV yet in my opinion. I like the current set up with one main event, 2 decent undercard fights at British/European level then prospects. I prefer having shows like this every 2/3 weeks than poor cards weekly with Commonwealth title fights as headliners.

    But moving to PPV would be a bad idea IMO. I'd only pay £15 for a card with Froch, Bellew, Brook & Frampton in meaningful fights in truth and if he did that, he'd be taking away headliners from future bills.
     
  5. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2007
    Messages:
    24,013
    Likes Received:
    16
    Undercard of Froch - Bute aint a bad shout at all.
     
  6. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,843
    Likes Received:
    5
    It would need to be a hell of a card with dual main event to be PPV worthy.

    Also wont be tuning in to Brook's next fight if it's not for either a title (against Alexander idealy) or against Khan

    The title fight is the big one though despite all the talk of Khan and Hatton i want to see British fighters fighting in the states on the World stage, not back here all the time where its safe,
     
  7. mishima

    mishima Guest

    you can talk when you pretended to be a black kenyan and now a stani :patsch
     
  8. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    34,376
    Likes Received:
    11,881
    more so than pesscott v khan:yep
     
  9. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    19,545
    Likes Received:
    8
  10. lost

    lost Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    3
    Khan Prescott was pretty bad, but Groves - Degale? The fight was for a british title for crying out loud! I guess I can't complain too much as I paid my 15 quid. But come on.
     
  11. Smoggy7188

    Smoggy7188 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    5,910
    Likes Received:
    0
    khan/salita, now thats 15quid well spent :patsch
     
  12. lost

    lost Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    3
    Yeah smog. But Salita was his mandatory and did we actually know that was going to happen? I certainly didn't see it coming.