Hopkins 1 Good Win Only

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pugilist64, Oct 2, 2008.

  1. pugilist64

    pugilist64 Guest

    The guy who won the fight is better. :hi:
     
  2. pugilist64

    pugilist64 Guest

    If you`re impressed with a fully blown middleweight beating a naturally smaller man then that`s up to you. It doesn`t impress me.
     
  3. treva1977

    treva1977 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Messages:
    3,784
    Likes Received:
    3
    he is still a good boxer.
     
  4. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Messages:
    27,684
    Likes Received:
    7
    I agree, Hopkins is better.
     
  5. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hopkins has more than one good win.

    Hopkins is greater than Calzaghe will ever be.

    Deal with it.
     
  6. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    76,131
    Likes Received:
    2,773
    Trinidad
    DLH
    Johnson
    Joppy
    Wright
    Echols

    Those are just a few, he wasn't WBC/WBA/IBF/WBO undisputed middleweight champion for 5 years fighting nobodies, he fought the top fighters in his division and unified from scratch holding the IBF title first then WBC, WBA(winning the tournament) and WBO. He had all the titles and didn't stay in his hometown like a certain fighter in Wales fighting tomato cans and claiming his WBO title is above all.
     
  7. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Excellent post :good
     
  8. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    So therefore you do not rate...

    HAGLER'S WINS OVER HEARNS AND DURAN.

    MONZON'S WINS OVER GRIFFITH AND NAPOLES.

    You are the silliest little fanny on this forum. :hi:
     
  9. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,420
    Likes Received:
    0
    i've gotta agree pugilist. you do calzaghe no favours with this horse****
     
  10. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    A poster called the Cobra made this quality point on another thread yesterday, I believe it was also in response to the moron known as Pugilist:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by the cobra
    Totally, because like Calzaghe, Hopkins had another champion in his weight division "dominating" it at the same time and he never fought him, right?

    Hopkins beat everyone that mattered at the weight for 10 years, Calzaghe did not once fight the best man he could have, as well as a few others.

    And Calzaghe is greater than Hopkins because when their challenger met each other, you know like Echols TKO3 Brewer, Holmes TKO12 Woodhall, Eastman W12 Ashira, Echols W12 Salem... they proved themselves superior, right?

    Honestly, your the worst poster on this site.



    I myself add:

    It should also be noted that Hopkins held the 3 major belts (WBC/WBA/IBF) from 2001-2005 (FOUR years), and all 4 genuine world titles (WBC/WBA/IBF/WBO) from 2004-2005.

    Joe Calzaghe held the WBO (the least valued and least prestigious of the 4) on its own from 1997-2006... that's NINE YEARS. Yes, NINE. He held the WBO and IBF together for 7 months, then went back to just the WBO again, then added the WBC and WBA. He NEVER held all 4 at the one time, and never defended all 3 WBC/WBA/IBF, not once.


    Who was the more dominant in their division? Give me a ****ing break. :hi:
     
  11. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    18,614
    Likes Received:
    8
    Forced him out of his gameplan??? Tito fights one way and one way only. Come foward and knock your opponent out. Plain and simple he did not get forced out of his gameplan.