Hopkins ~vs~ Dawson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Oct 21, 2008.

  1. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    12,013
    Likes Received:
    3
    Dawson by close decision.

    Hopkins makes it ugly but loses yet again to his achilles heel: a good boxer with great speed.
     
  2. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    3,589
    Likes Received:
    1
    I agree with alot of the Taylor comparisons.

    The problem for Dawson is that Hopkins lands VERY well vs. lefties.

    I think Hopkins would put Chad on his ass but the decision will be very close in the end.

    I see it as a 55-45 fight in favor of the Old Master and I voted that Hopkins would win.
     
  3. The Phenom

    The Phenom Pretty Handsome Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4,248
    Likes Received:
    354
    Hopkins has too much skill,experience,sel-belief and ring intelligience.
     
  4. gilad

    gilad Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    10
    B-Hop had close fights with Taylor only because of the weight. Hell, he looked **** against Eastman the fight before. It has nothing to do with Taylor's speed, every round Bernard threw punches, he won big.

    Dawson is a small lightheavyweight, a southpaw, and has chin issues. If an old Glen Johnson figured him out, I know that B-Hop will beat him. Like Pavlik, Dawson has been put against bangers like Adamek and Johnson. He's never been in the ring with a fighter that is even close to B-Hop in terms of skills and slickness.
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    49,972
    Likes Received:
    17,405
    I tend to agree with this, and would add, Hopkins is not only more efficient with picking his spots, but he's more difficult to hit as well.
     
  6. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    22,781
    Likes Received:
    360
    I'm somewhat surprised at the voting. Perhaps people's opinion of Hopkins has been swayed by his latest performance against Pavlik?

    Pavlik and Dawson are completely different fighters. Pavlik is about as predictable as one can get. But that one dimension works well. But against a guy like Hopkins, he completely nuetralized this one dimension.

    Dawson is a supremely gifted fighter with great hand speed and he throws from different angles. He's also doesn't fight flat footed like Pavlik and can move on his toes.

    If you look at the guys Hopkins have had trouble with in the past and the guys he figured out and took to school, Dawson fits perfectly with the guys Hopkins has had trouble with.
     
  7. Andyw

    Andyw Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    57
    You think? I reckon as long as Calz keeps his word and retires this fight will be on, BHOP seems to always seek out big challenges and take them on, wish more were like him.

    Anyway, I go Hopkins but that could be my heart ruling my head, think Dawson has the style to give Hops problems but if his chin is as suspect as some make out Hops will find it...
     
  8. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,209
    Likes Received:
    292
    Thumbs up mate. :thumbsup

    I still can't pick a winner in this one though :huh