Hopkins's Legacy

Well there's no bias in that post is there?

That's about as open minded an approach to his career as a Jew looking into Hitler's past.

Certainly not comparing Hopkins to Hitler - But the way some of the Calzaghe fans are talking on this board it's close.

You can't hold an era against a fighter.

You could easily go overly pro-Hopkins and say -

* Beaten by a Prime RJJ by only a couple of points when he was still raw

* Ruler of a very average MW Division, with more defences of the title than any other middle in history
* Reputation for beating up little men, much like Carlos Monzon. Except of course Glenn Johnson and Tarver
* 2 highly disputed losses to the talented Taylor
* Tarver win means something.

Stupid post.

His legacy is instant HoF in five years post retirement.

Deal with it.

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

It was always fun, man. Most people **** me off on here, because they don't respect to anyones opinion. I disagreed with you a lot on Hopkins, but it was always cool, 'cause I knew you'd listen to what I was saying even if you thought I was talking out of my arse. Even though we went round in circles a few times, I enjoyed it.

The guy posts all kinds of biased bull****. He's admitted to blatantly being biased a few days ago, actually. I don't know what his game is, but I tend to ignore him. He probably wants to **** people off. People on ESB will always take te bait, I guess.









(To any outsiders, excuse the little lovefest here. I'll go back to being a grumpy **** soon )

 

:thumbsup

Your a very good poster on all things NOT Bernard Hopkins related. So you know your always cool with me bro!!!

(oh and your always a grumpy **** to me as well..but its all good.. )

 

Thanks for opening my eyes. I've never looked at it this way.