How come its not called the fab 5 era?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TIGEREDGE, Jun 20, 2009.

  1. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    42,502
    Likes Received:
    405
    People often forget how often Benitez was badly hurt even during his prime. He got tagged, even by lesser fighters. Great defensive fighter, but he was not flawless. No fighter ever was.
     
  2. birddog

    birddog Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,012
    Likes Received:
    1
    One of Wilfreds flaws was that he didn't like to get hit (not that anyone does), But he did lack pop on his punches, and didn't go forward well. Of course that may need to be put in context considering who his losses were too.

    I agree that a Hagler fight was never in the cards for many reasons. And hagler wouldhave been all wrong for him.


    I wonder if he could have been more with a differnet thrainer than his pop's, but I don't think so.
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    55,276
    Likes Received:
    49,671
    Actually it was. Very much on the cards too. After Wilfred beat Duran so convincingly there was much talk among the experts of Benitez and his style possibly being the one to dethrone Hagler.

    Benitez himself had started talking it up a bit too. Hagler commented as well. If Benitez had beaten Hearns you can take it to the bank that he would have fought Hagler, probably next fight.

    Benitez after beating Duran, upon being asked his thoughts on Hagler. "I think he is marvelous".