I scored it for Pacquiao 115-113, and that's me being generous to Floyd, who was running and throwing feather pot-shots at Pacquiao the whole night. Evander Holyfield and Shane Mosley also had Pacquiao winning. A boxer can see who's throwing real punches and making the fight, as opposed to a guy who's running away and tapping the other man.
I thought Floyd won, but I can't see how you can score it wider than 8-4, I voted 8-4, but 7-5 is probably more accurate.
Anywhere between 118-110 to 116-112 Floyd I've watched it 6 or 7 times, and I flip flop on whether to give 7 and 8 to Pac. 1-3,5 and 9-12 were all Floyd 4 and 6 were all Pac. You lose credibility with me giving Pac more than 4 rounds. I immediately consider you an idiot if I see "I watched it in slo-mo and..."
I think a one armed Pacquiao fought valiantly and it was a very competitive (if boring) fight. 115-113 either way or a draw are all reasonable scores. We all knew Pac needed to win by KO to get Mayweather's "0" in Vegas though.
Yeah that's why canelo got a draw on Mexican holiday. Why would judges rig a fight for the guy who isn't an underdog? Ydksab
Wylan why is it that we have had plenty of closer fights than may vs PAC. Yet this is the only figbt where we need slow motion to see who won? I think if it was the same fight but not PAC in there nobody would claim he won the fight. Really shows the low level fans PAC brings to the table
Imagine if the fight had taken place in the Phillippines, and Pacquiao had had both arms to punch with.
Can't give Pac more than 4 rounds, and that's if you're being generous. I gave Pac 3 rounds. (4, 6, and can't remember the other round)
because the punches that floyd "landed" in regular speed didn't land in slow-mo but they were counted anyway. that's why floyd won