How does RING have Canelo PFP but not GGG?

You need to learn to articulate, because you were but apparently did not even realize it. You keep arguing against Golovkins inclusion but thats not what I am talking about at all. I could GAF if Ring includes him or not.

Canelo has been P4P for 60 weeks. Thats well before Cotto beat a one-legged Martinez to even make your absurd triangle theory relevant.

So are you going to engage some neurons and make a relevant argument to the point that Canelo should have been rated P4P 60 weeks ago? Or are you going to continue trying to deflect with absurd inflammatory statements?

 

How about you remove your head from your ass and smell the fresh air?

I could not care less about what the Ring Magazine said 60 weeks ago or even yesterday. The Ring Magazine doesn't matter.

What matters is resume.

Alvarez' resume > Golovkin's resume

Period, end of.

Alvarez has beaten world class opposition. Golovkin, OTOH, has beaten the best that Chef Boyardee's TOMATO CANs have had to offer.

Any questions?

 

Then why doesn't Stevens move down to 154 and prove it?

 

Cancel I is 24 fighting the best while GGG fight darren barkers leftovers rofl

 

Ring Magazine is owned by De La Hoya. Look into the matter yourself if you don't believe me.

 

GGG has the potential to be #1 P4P ONE DAY. And will be. He just doesnt need to be there now.

 

So you take a point about Canelo getting ranked P4P for beating Austin "No Doubt a Journeyman" Trout 60 weeks ago... due to politics, and once again return to talking about Golovkins resume. Try not to lose the plot next time.

Almost forgot that when you were still Naysayer you held to same spot on the boards that SSG currently fills. :conf

I will now leave you to your regularly scheduled program of "ignoring the topic at hand, and crying about Golovkin" :hi:

 

if "resume not skill" then it should also apply to pac and floyd. He he he

 

You could make a strong case Canelo lost to Trout and Lara




Oscar pays the ring magazine employees *hint hint*

 

None of Golovkin's victims would be even in a top 100 P4P list no way you make the list without a single win against a top level fighter

 

i remember when they had broner at #6atsch

 

GGG first fight Gabor Balogh the guy was 1-22 -3

and still fighting ,his record now is 3-112(40 KO)-5 ...what fighter wants that on his resume'

 

Peoples opinion on Canelo are based off of Lara/Trout if you think he beat them close you rated him high if you think he lost both close you rated him low. All I can say is what would you put more stock in a fighter beating Mayweather/Pacquiao close or a guy who blewout Corley/Rios a crazy metaphor I know but that really it GGG is fighting the Matt Hatton types while Nelo is fighting top rated guys

 

So you class macklin and geale as the Matthew hattons of this world?