:roll: I guess that's why the ref warned him about it. Toney goes low, and poor Sam can't help but use his left hand to push Toney's had in position and chop down at the back of his head Sam just accidentally hits people with borderline-to-blatant rabbit punches in every fight, when 99% of boxers don't. It's just a coincidence, it just miraculously happens regularly every time Sam fights
in Peter's defense Toney did alot of ducking down forward basically giving him nothing but the back of his head to hit.
Oh so wait, now it's borderline to blatant? Look I'm not saying he doesn't land rabbit punches. Obviously he does. Is he alone? No. Does he land them with the frequency the KLITCLUB likes to spout about? No. Infact much of the "rabbit punch' work is actually legal work. And on a guy like James Toney it is SMART work. When a guy gives you such little room to land and you still manage to hit him it is impressive. It just so happens that the KLITCLUB cannot tell the difference between the back of the head and the side, which doesn't surprise me much.
It would be pretty ****ing hard to land blatant ones without landing borderline ones now wouldn't it? Especially when you throw those type of clubbing roundhouse shots regularly. He landed plenty of blatant ones and plenty of borderline ones against Toney. . He does it all the time, he did against Wlad, he did against Toney, he did it against Sykes, and Diaz, and basically everyone he fights. Peter fanboys are always talking about how it's Wlad fanboys saying this and that about him. Even if you take the Wlad fight out of the equation entirely, Peter still routinely aims shots at the back of his opponents heads. It's his most effective punch in a lot of ways
I pick Peter, but we will really see where Peter stands as far as skill level after the Maskaev fight.
Well I don't know you tell me. You seem to have this idea that he is gunning for the back of the head when all I see are punches placed at the side of the head on a guy who will never give you his front side. Underlined statement: Seeing as how you bring this up yet again, I want some sort of detailed analysis as to where and when these blatant rabbit punches happened. And for the record the Sykes knockout was a series of LEGITIMATE punches and the last caught Sykes after he was out cold on his way to the canvas. Can't help that. This nonsense always comes from the KLITCLUB. Who else would claim a little green man poisoned Waldo's legs? Who else would claim beating a string of cans cemented Vitlay's legacy? And those punches were aimed at the side of the head, which is not the back of the head. You do know that the human skull has 4 sides yes?
Easiest pick ever. Wlad fought the first fight to save stamina. He'd fight again that but now he knows he can hurt Peter, so he'd drop the ****ing bomb on that behind the head mother****er in 7 rounds.
Clinching to survive is one thing. Clinching to substitute an inside strategy is completely immoral and lame. I hated many guys for implementing this bull**** into their game and Waldo will be no different. 94 clinches over 12 rounds. ALL instigated by Waldo. One rabbit punch by Sam which could be called blatant and that is even controversial. If DKP is on the ball Randy Newman, or any other ref who allows WWE tactics will not see this fight anywhere but ringside. I say bring Robert Byrd in. He seems to know the difference between a survival clinch and a crutch.
How can I do that, and why should I do that, when I already provided video evidence of Peter trying to hold Toney's head in place with his left hand, followed and bring a series of chopping punches down towards the back of his skull, followed by a warning by the ref? It doesn't get much clearer or more obvious than that and you're still in denial Go back and watch the clip from 3:10-3:15, you'll see Sam literally use a half-open left glove to push Toney's head downwards, followed by a clubbing shot at the back of his skull, just seconds after being warned by the ref for rabbit punches. http://youtube.com/watch?v=DxLpJpyEOmE I'm not going to bother giving a more detailed analysis than that to someone who refuses to believe what's right before their eyes on the video
I'm not in denial, you are. How many of those punches landed on the cerebellum area? Or even the optical area? The answer: 1 The one time James Toney was up against the ropes, ducking REAL low to obviously draw a foul. -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbit_punch
I think that for the most part the first fight Wlad played it safe. I think that he has since realized that peter is an over rated puncher. Also at the end of their first fight he landed a left hook that nearly KO'd peter, now knowing that he can hurt peter I think that he will look for the KO and get it
"Oblitirates again"?????????????????????????????????????????? :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl What the fucc fight did you watch? :nut The first fight was a 3 point decision for Wlad and one in which the only three semi-decent shots Peter landed ALL NIGHT knocked Wlad down. What would ever happen if he hit him with a real power shot? :think I'll tell you... LIGHTS OUT WLAD.