JMM is a great great fighter but Pac is way ahead of JMM in terms of p4p greatness. atsch If you dont realize this, then you wont
Yes PFP PAC has the slight edge due to his resume, but in H2H most people have JMM 2-0 over Pac. And like I said should JMM take a victory over JMM, that would beat anything PAC has ever done and would place JMM ahead of PAC. If yout don't realize that, I wouldn't be surprised:hi:
If Marquez were to beat Void, but he will have to fight the referee and judges to win that one. Marquez will have to knock Void out to get a split decision.
lol dont be smart, do a poll on where they rank ATG now. It wont be a slight edge. Youd be surprised. If JMM beats floyd, hes right up there even. And I hope he beats Floyd. Im that objective
I don't need a poll to tell me who ranks higher right now. I already told you. And no, you're not objective if you don't believe beating Floyd at welter is better than anything Pac ever did.
First you said Pac has slight edge now in terms of ATG, which is not? Next i never said that if JMM beats Floyd that he doesnt trump Pacs as far as beating the better fighter. Is having a conversation with you this hard?
Pac and Marquez compliment each other, a lot. After both fights, each fighter has gotten better and better and has not faced any real challenges in any other opponents. It's fascinating how two different fighters have helped each other evolve - especially this late in Marquez' career.
ok Ill forget the "slight" edge. But man Id be wishing hard for Floyd to lose. This ****in site will crash. Roger will reclaim the title of the best Mayweather fighter
Regarding fighting overated and shot fighters. The same thing can be said to marquez. I do believe that everyone here thinks that casamayor is already shot when he faced marquez. And juan diaz, that baby fat is overated. Who has he beaten expect a shot frietas? Jmm is an excellent boxer but pac is just better. The reason why pac had a hard time against jmm is that pac's style is tailor made for jmm.
That's exactly what I was talking about. You only made an issue of my comment because you focused on the word "slight". I agree the last part of your post though.