How good was Johnny Tapia

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Noel857, May 7, 2021.



  1. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran Full Member

    7,268
    9,112
    Mar 24, 2019
    Been thinking about fighters who regularly appeared on tv in the 90`s and Johnny`s name is etched in my mind.How does he rate on here?
     
  2. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    12,608
    10,372
    Mar 19, 2012
    Outstanding at 115 and 118lbs. He is one of the few that was talented enough to miss 4 years of his prime and win the title. He was still somewhat of a prospect when he was suspended for Drugs.
    Him and Ali. I guess Foreman too.
     
    Clinton, Gatekeeper, thistle and 2 others like this.
  3. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    12,608
    10,372
    Mar 19, 2012
    Johnny was very quick, he had a b beautiful left hook and he always finished with it. Decent power. Good chin.
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    53,966
    32,918
    Feb 11, 2005
    He was fantastic. Great boxing skills to go along with ridiculous toughness and motor. Achieved what he did in spite of his demons.
     
  5. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    21,588
    12,234
    Apr 3, 2012
    Slightly worse than Rafael Marquez.
     
  6. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,102
    41,931
    Mar 3, 2019
    Tapia before his lay off was like Walter McGowan but with less scarable skin and much quicker hands. He was very, very good and could be very entertaining.

    Definitely top five at 115.
     
  7. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,293
    6,967
    Oct 25, 2006
    Pretty good. Tough as nails with the heart of a lion.
     
    thistle and Noel857 like this.
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    21,588
    12,234
    Apr 3, 2012
    Galaxy
    Sung Kil Moon
    Mark Johnson
    Tokuyama
    Martin Castillo
    Vic Darchinyan
    Donaire
    Sor Rungvisai
    Estrada

    And Inoue was better h2h.

    I really wouldn't say there's anything definite about having him in the top 5.
     
  9. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,573
    8,085
    Feb 2, 2006
    He would have beaten Vic and rather easily.
    Actually with the exception of Johnson I could see him besting all on that list.
     
    ETM likes this.
  10. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    21,588
    12,234
    Apr 3, 2012
    No. Vic is badly underrated due to his ugly style, but he was an animal and has a huge resume at 115.

    Donaire would’ve beaten the absolute **** out of Tapia, as would’ve Inoue.
     
  11. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,049
    5,587
    Aug 17, 2011
    When he was "Tap Tap" Tapia, before the layoff, he was amazing.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  12. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,417
    20,250
    Jun 26, 2009
    I just know that I’ve never seen anyone fight with more of their heart on their sleeve than Tapia.

    His passion and drive were visceral.

    You could almost reach out and touch his rage and intensity.

    His story was heartbreaking.

    RIP.
     
  13. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,102
    41,931
    Mar 3, 2019
    Galaxy and Moon, sure.

    Donaire and Too Sharp had no more than five fights at 115 between them. Not sure how you think they're greater there.

    Tapia was a clear level above Estrada and Rungvisai, and he'd have all the tools to beat them. Cuadras either nearly beat, or did beat the pair of them.

    Tokuyama was decent but has little outside of two robberies vs Penalosa.

    Inoue can be argued to be better head-to-head, but it's no sure thing. Even the old verison of Tapia who whitewashed Konadu would be by far and away Inoue's best opponent.

    Castillo? Darchinyan? Don't take the ****.

    Its interesting that you don't mention two of the actual greatest super-flyweights ever, Roman and Watanabe. It's almost like you either have an absurdly bias view towards more modern fighters, or don't actually know too much about the weight.
     
  14. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    21,588
    12,234
    Apr 3, 2012
    I started at 1989, which is the first Ring list.

    Tapia didn't actually do that much at 115. Beating Romero and Arthur Johnson isn't that great.

    No way was he a level above Sor and Estrada. Nor was he above Darchinyan. He could've competed with them, sure, but he never did anything to prove he was better.
     
  15. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,102
    41,931
    Mar 3, 2019
    So your entire basing is off Ring's rankings?

    Tapia took four years off, then came back and made like 15 title defences, as well as beating Romero. In a shallow division, that's very impressive.

    Given Rungvisai and Estrada's issues with Cuadras, it's hard to not envision Tapia building on that with a similar style based speed and workrate. The fact that Tapia was miles better than Cuadras doesn't bode well for them. Even still, neither have had enough fights at 115 to actually claim to be top five, so they have to rely on eye test. And in my eyes, they're not better, nor beating Tapia.
     
    ETM likes this.