How good was Sharmba Mitchell

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by steve1990, May 15, 2020.


  1. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,025
    16,928
    Apr 3, 2012
    No, Mitchell was slicker and had faster feet. Corley punched harder, was more durable, and had better counterpunching.

    Mitchell had Don King backing him and making things fall into place if I remember right. Corley had limited management but still beat Bailey, which is the best win between the two of them, and was competitive with Judah. He also gave Mayweather more problems than Mitchell.
     
  2. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,224
    9,761
    Jun 23, 2008
    I'd put him above Corley, but there's not a huge gap.

    Corley had more pop and a better chin.

    Mitchell was faster (of both hand and foot) and a bit slicker.

    Judah was a bit higher class than both, so I'd rank them Judah>Mitchell>Corley.
     
    Jpreisser likes this.
  3. steve1990

    steve1990 Active Member Full Member

    1,163
    873
    Jul 7, 2012
    Mitchell was past his prime when he fought Mayweather though he even in his prime he still doesn't beat Mayweather.
     
    NoNeck likes this.
  4. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,047
    6,780
    Sep 8, 2013
    Well put, Saad.
     
    steve1990 likes this.
  5. steve1990

    steve1990 Active Member Full Member

    1,163
    873
    Jul 7, 2012
    Nice analysis another thing is Mitchell was smart enough to retire before random journeyman started to beat him.