Nunn vs Randall Yonker: 1991-11-29168Randall Yonker http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=000462&cat=boxer Nunn was also much better than Dan Schommer who Eubank needed a gift decision to beat.
Even if what you says is true, it doesn't mean they wouldn't of picked up McCallum-Eubank. Stop trolling
Is that the same Sibson that Hagler methodically broke down and stopped in eight? Hagler was always in control of that fight
Dude, seriously, give it up. They didn't pick McCallum-Eubank, and Eubank-Stretch was huge news with a Who's Who of British celebs ringside.
That was Collins 17 pro fight. He was still working as an electrican when he took that fight Hell no Collins held his own against McCallum and banked a lot of the later rounds - while Watson got schooled and stopped. Collins would then go on to beat Eubank twice Collins>>>Watson Collins won both of those fight- he clearly outworked Eubank in both fights
Thornton was a journeyman who worked as a post man during the day. Rocchigiani never beat anyone worth mentioning at smw. His claim to fame would come at lhw where he would beat a clowning Michael Nunn around 98 Lindell Holmes was at the end of his career, around 35 years old and would go 1-3 in his last 4 fights Wharton never beat anyone worth mentioning
Because Eubank says somthing that make it true? How about a quote from McCallum or better yet a neutral insider talking about Eubank-McCallum? I see you forgot to mention this: Your using a Google message group as a reliable source? Thats equivalent to me quoting from this esb forum