How would Mayweather had done against Trout at 154??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JM22, Jun 7, 2013.


  1. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    a repeat of Canelo-Trout, only Floyd wins wider on the cards
     
  2. Bustajay

    Bustajay Feel the Steel/Balls Deep Full Member

    32,582
    12,499
    Dec 9, 2012
    :patschWTF? Trout was killing red:smoke
     
  3. Barrera

    Barrera Defeated Boxing_master Full Member

    17,775
    1,630
    Jul 13, 2012
    hahahaha judah immediately came to mind before i even finished reading
     
  4. Barrera

    Barrera Defeated Boxing_master Full Member

    17,775
    1,630
    Jul 13, 2012
    you honestly think so.. hey i gotta respect your opinion but if that fight showed me one thing its that canelo can slip incredibly well...
     
  5. twenty1

    twenty1 Final Destruction Full Member

    3,191
    0
    Jun 2, 2007
    People in this post are denying Canelo's win over Trout.

    So let me get this straight...


    Trout would be a difficult fight for Mayweather, but the guy(Canelo) who just beat Trout is a walkthrough for Floyd?......


    The denial is real.


    #CaneloAllDay
     
  6. mono

    mono Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,215
    1,404
    May 31, 2013

    Wider than 118-109?
     
  7. ATrillionaire

    ATrillionaire Noah Full Member

    350
    0
    Dec 9, 2009
    JMM isn't slick...Trout is slick. Please define slick.
     
  8. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    Pretty much...
     
  9. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    I doubt Floyd comes close to knocking out/flooring Trout with just 1 punch like Canelo did . Trout would have even LESS respect for Floyd .
     
  10. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    This is exactly why I made this thread a lot of newbies are picking Mayweather to easily beat Canelo because he had fits against Trout, but they don't realize Mayweather would had also had hell against Trout.
     
  11. Real-G

    Real-G Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,727
    8
    May 18, 2013
    Please say your kidding ??? Trout is not even an elite boxer, he managed to beat a lack luster cotto now he's a world beater?
     
  12. Real-G

    Real-G Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,727
    8
    May 18, 2013
    Just how does Trout's busy, in-accurate, slow plodding style would be a problem for floyd?

    Floyd was more likely hoping Trout would win, with Trout he would have had easier fight and larger percentage of the prize money .
     
  13. P.M.

    P.M. Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,907
    0
    May 31, 2012
    He wouldn't fight trout, not because he'd be a hard fight but because trout is a no name fighter. He's high risk little reward, floyd isn't a middleweight he's only fighting canelo because the fans demand it. After canelo unless they rematch floyd will stay at 147.
     
  14. Zombieguy

    Zombieguy Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,989
    1
    Feb 6, 2011
    So he's ducking Trout to face the guy who beat Trout. Gotcha.

    Pac is still ducking consciousness.
     
  15. Sunchild78

    Sunchild78 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,721
    50
    Sep 25, 2009
    After this fight Floyd should stay at 147lbs. He's not that great at 154lbs even though he's been successful. I doubt Trout and him would ever meet, but if they do. I believe Floyd can beat him, but it won't be a walk in the park.