How Would You Rate Mayweather, H2H, at Each Weight?

I think Floyd Sr ( not Jr ) too was more skilled than Salido ever was in his dreams.
Maybe he even was not worse than Jr.

 

Don’t worry Floyd’s boxing sons Tank and Devin Haney will put the finishing touches on Lomachenko. Lomachenko would be easier to like if it was not for his groupie Lomasexuals.

 

BTW, I never was Loma fan but you most likely are homosexual, nothing wrong with this, this is normal thing.
No offense but this is boxing forum, not about sexuality.

 

Don't worry, I will place you on my ignore list too. I do not have time to read up your posts.

 

135- Duran, Chavez, Mosely, De La Hoya, Armstrong
140- Duran, De La Hoya
147- Robinson, Leonard, Hearns, Duran, Forrest, De La Hoya
154- Norris

 

Thanks but I am very much the opposite of a homosexual. No one called you a homosexual but you doth protest too much so obvious conclusions could be drawn. The term used about Lomachenko fanboys is “Lomasexuals” not homosexuals unless you are educating us that they are the same thing. I am not qualified to say what is normal but I doubt being a Lomasexual is normal.

 

He’d have had no road to victory against Hearns.

Too small to outbox him, no power to stop him.

 

You have proven time and again that you are completely incapable of objectively debating the guy’s career.

Floyd was great. One of the greatest to ever grace the ring. But he wasn’t a Marvel character.

You’ve never seen him come close to losing?

No, you haven’t. But the rest of us did.

You’d have to be a fool to not envisage him losing to guys like Hearns, Winky and McCallum at JMW. But then again, you once told me that Floyd would have beaten Bernard Hopkins. Ha!

Relax.

If someone says that the huge greats of the past could have beaten Floyd, they’re not hating on him. He was still a great fighter.

 

Winky and Mike would only have had an outside chance of outboxing him on his worst night??

There’s no way that Floyd could have beaten Hearns at JMW.

I can’t even think of a worse stylistic match up for him.

 

Great post George.

Floyd was never beating Mike, Hearns or Winky.

What on earth are these opinions even based on?

A close fight with Oscar and an easy win over Canelo at a C-W?

Bizarre.

 

The same goes for Floyd, where we have guys like you taking him over Bernard Hopkins.

 

Surprised nobody has mentioned prime Mosley at 135.

And I will say there always lesser fighters who end up giving elites a hard controversial fight. If Floyd had never fought Castillo would anyone look back and say Castillo would have arguably beat him had they fought? And well they did fight he actually arguably did in fact defeat Mayweather.

 

Considering that Floyd's best win at 130 was Corrales. His best win at 135 was Castillo. His best win at 140 was Judah. His best win at 147 an old Pac. His best win at 154 and old DLH. Floyd did retire undefeated.

But considering his best win at each weight is it really that hard to think that prime versions of Duran, Whitaker, Chavez, Pac, Leonard, Robinson, Hearns, DLH, Mosley, etc. Could in fact beat him?

Surely those guys would be a step up in class compared to what he faced???

 

50/50 may be generous, but Mayweather could win at 147 by ducking Hearns' jab, countering with the jab to the body (one of Floyd's best punches), clinching/turning and generally trying to **** Tommy off so that he starts swinging thereby exposing himself to the right hand.