Please don't make me laugh. Being undisputed in a weight class doesn't have anything to do with P4P. It's a measure of skill and recent performances.
I don't agree with all of it bit its a personal list It is what it is Ifs only Canelo being so low thats absolutely riled you lol
p4p criteria had been introduced when fighters with foreign passports had been approwed by US media and by US pundits and journalists as enough good and this term p4p means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. p4p is TOILET PAPER worth noise like pro boxing belts, casual belt from store is better and more valuable than this stuff per se. For example looks that Frazier and Ali were undisputed by their time criteria and Patterson too and this is not thing called as p4p. More than this: p4p should be separated by eras: retired/ active boxers and rounds era: 12 rounders, 15 rounders and longer than 15 rounders era in pro boxing. Anyone who attempt to compare this as sole list is just big fun for me.
It's one thing to have Inoue #1, that's your opinion, we might disagree but that's not unreasonable to have Inoue P4P #1. To have Canelo #9 behind fighters with recent losses and sub-par performances is not justifiable.
Really? What do you want, quotas? Funny, he probably gave no thought to race but you saw it as the primary factor...and you want to imply he is the biased one?
Yeah that is my primary issue. Gvozdyk and Kalajdzic shouldn't be your best two victories by a country mile if you're p4p #2.