If Danny Jacobs loses tommorow ....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dance84, May 3, 2019.


  1. rhin0z>

    rhin0z> Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,405
    1,089
    Jul 13, 2014
    Jacobs will need a JMM ktfo6 . noway he gets a decision. I like both guys ,its just cash cow business.
     
  2. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    that is a true point Brian.
     
    Braindamage likes this.
  3. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    "it suggests" is not the same as saying its a fact or even a formed opinion.
     
  4. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,844
    15,621
    Nov 9, 2015
    So, it's not a fact - correct - nor is it your opinion; formed or partially so ('formed opinion' so try-hard). And yet you still decided to post a comment. Strange.

    By the way, do you actually like boxing? Nothing you write ever suggests you do....
     
    Birmingham likes this.
  5. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    246,637
    242,899
    Nov 23, 2013
    It's already been said, but it bears repeating, over and over and over and over again.

    Charlo has already been tested, and he failed that test miserably.:deal:
     
    FloatingGhost likes this.
  6. yeyo monster

    yeyo monster Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,198
    937
    May 4, 2012
    I see jacobs vs charlo, a win paper for jacobs, but charlo is more hungry
     
  7. Puroresu_Fan

    Puroresu_Fan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,618
    6,476
    Apr 6, 2016
    Charlo loses to Jacobs. I don't think Charlo wants any part of Jacobs.
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    true




    true

    it looks strange because you avoideded mentioning the context - that the OP's point is more likely to suggest the opposite of what he claims.

    like and dislike, you should too, its a contentious sport.
     
  9. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,844
    15,621
    Nov 9, 2015
    The context was: You making an observation - to which you later chose not to commit - in a thread about a boxer, you later stated the comment should not be applied to. That 'posh university' you 'attend'. High fees are they? Parent kept the receipt?
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    the context remains an opposing inference, dont pretend its anything else.

    u were told it was inference already so restart with that, or continue to pretend its something else.
     
  11. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,844
    15,621
    Nov 9, 2015
    Pure word salad...
     
  12. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    inference.
    just google it, dont play silly billy.
     
  13. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,844
    15,621
    Nov 9, 2015
    ahh.... a word side salad now...
     
  14. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    some time sooner than later
     
  15. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,844
    15,621
    Nov 9, 2015
    Herol, we've already established words aren't your strong suit, so why waste the ones you do have a grasp of trying to have the last one?