If Ezzard Charles HW title reign went like this...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Apr 16, 2015.

  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    37,088
    Likes Received:
    3,779
    Would his heavyweight ranking be a lot higher? I think this would be a terrific reign good enough to move him into top 10-12 all time

    1949

    June 22nd. Jersey Joe Walcott- Hall of Famer

    August 10th Jimmy Bivins- Hall of Famer

    October 14th Turkey Thompson- # 3 rated

    1950

    August 15th Archie Moore - Hall of Famer

    September 27th Joe Louis- Hall of Famer

    December 5th Joey Maxim- Hall of Famer

    1951

    January 12th Bob Baker- #5 rated

    March 7th Jersey Joe Walcott- Hall of Famer

    May 30th Clarence Henry- # 4 rated


    This would have given him a 9-0 record in championship fights, withh 8 title defenses, With 6 wins against hall of famers. The other wins being over some of the divisions most dangerous, best young contenders baker and henry(whom marcianos camp avoided). Both Henry and Baker were highly decorated amateurs as well.

    You take out the barones Oma's lessnevichs beshores and valentinos and replace them with the better fighters
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    58,747
    Likes Received:
    21,593
    He'd already beat Moore 3 times and Moore wasn't a ranked contender at HW in that year, was he ?
     
  3. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,478
    Likes Received:
    129
    Valentino had beat Turkey Thompson in his previous fight, he was the better choice for the Oct 49 defense.

    And I don't think beating Bivins and maxim even more times would add much.

    Baker and Henry are interesting, but fans don't want to credit Moore for beating these execellent youn contenders, why would they credit Charles, just forgotten guys to the mainstream, their loss.
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    37,088
    Likes Received:
    3,779
    Because 2 reasons. 1. They were non title fights and 2. not enough film of baker Henry. I posted baker vs henry on YouTube 4 years ago. Both fighters looked very good..Henry had a monstrous left hook..baker showed elite boxing skills