If Haye had faced all Wlads opponents how many wins would he have ??

So Haye gets to stay in his prime throughout the whole of the run?

That's not very realistic, is it?

 

If he faced them all he would likely lose a few. That is why Wlad is seen as great, his greatest argument to being considered among the best is the amount of people he has gone through.

If you consider each fighter on their own most people would pick Haye, but when you consider all of them you have to assume Haye loses eventually, out of the list running in that order I wouldn't be confident against Byrd, Peter and Chambers, but if he were to fight any of them with large gaps around them taking little punishment (like his heavyweight career) I'd favour Haye.

 

I agree that Sanders would never trouble Haye, but '04 Brewster and '05 Peter would give him fits.

 

An older version of Sanders give a prime Vitali one of his toughest fights but he "would never trouble Haye". atsch

Sanders is dangerous against anyone and has a much better cv than Haye, he even has a better win over a CW than Haye does.

 

It is brittard logic.

 

Your list is almost exactly the same as mine. However, you give Haye a good chance of beating Brewster from the first Wlad fight and make Haye the clear fav in the second.

This would be the Brewster who ppl generally compare DelBoy to irt boxing style.

I'll admit that Brewster was a bit of back and forth with his ability to maintain intensity in the ring, but if he brought it, Haye would not see the final bell. He could walk through Hayes biggest shots and certainly deliver the blows necessary to put Haye on the backfoot for the entirety of the fight. And Brewster, unlike DelBoy knew how to deliver the punches.

Brewster KO6.:think

 

Maybe germongs believe vittles beats haye but most people dont