IF JMM beats PBF, would he be the number one boxer out there ?

Shut the **** up with the double standards.


He feels JMM lost to Pac. But you come in here and say until the result is changed he didn't. Do you know how ****ing stupid you sound specially when you've argued against other decisions?

****ing moron.

Until the result is changed Floyd never lost to Castillo. So SHUT THE **** UP you double standard *******.

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4099182&postcount=51

 

The only way JMM would be # 1 P4P is if he beats FMJ and Pac loses to Cotto. If Pac and JMM both win, then the ranking should still be the same, IMO.

 

Yep:bbb

 

:good

 

If PBF looks okay and doesn't appear that slowed, then yes.

 

Beating Mayweather makes up for the incompetent judging tho as Pac hasnt even fought, never mind beat anyone as good as Mayweather.

 

^ ^ ^
The inbred returns

 

If PBF looks okay and doesn't appear that slowed then Marquez wont win ****, realistically.

 

Oh good one.

That doesn't change the fact that just got caught in the middle of one.


Why argue any decision if you are going to always bring up until they change the decision JMM lost to Pac. atsch

You know how ignorant you sound?

And then, I dig up showing your stupid ass saying Floyd lost the first fight and it was a robbery.

Double Standards at it's best and you the ******* can't handle that you just got caught red handed.


So Shut the **** Up *******.

 

probably not. Floyd is not the number one fighter now. Pacman is.

 

He was right tho & you know it.
Since when do us fans let judges tell us who is the better fighter ?
We learned many yrs ago that they cannot be trusted with the simplest of tasks.
Sure, Pac beat JMM on paper but paper is for casual fans that flip a coin between tennis & boxing if both are on at the same time, not serious fans that know the sport & judge for themselves.

 

probably not. Floyd is not the number one fighter now. Pacman is. Yet if Cotto beats Pacman, I don't think he should be number one. Sort of like when Livingstone Bramble fought Edwin Rosario in 1986. Bramble was number 4 p4p at the time. When Rosario won in 2 rounds, Bramble went out of the rankings but Rosario did not go in the p4p ranking. There is really no protocol that says because a fighter beats a p4p fighter, he takes that fighters place.

 

have to beat pac first

 

I never bitched about it. I didn't post in this thread until I saw what your stupid ass wrote.


You cried robbery in the past about Castillo-Mayweather 1. Saying Floyd lost and it was a robbery.


Yet when someone says Marquez won against Pacquiao and you come in with some childish bull**** what do you expect?

Until the result is changed JMM lost to Pac. Then you shouldn't ****ing complain about any decision then right? Because until the official decision is changed it doesn't matter.

Stupid *******. Go suck Manny's dick more, you bring nothing to the forum besides tidbits of bias and sucking your fellow *******s off.

 

Thats all good but if its 2 elite p4pers, 2 serious contenders for the no1 spot, somethings gotta give.

****, Whitaker overtook Chavez as the p4p best even tho the official verdict was a draw.... surely its not too hard to see JMM being the consensus no1 by beating FMJ considering FMJ is better than Pac himself & most people thought JMM beat Pac last time (just like most had Whitaker beating Chavez)

Fair points, no ?