the weakest of the champions right?:roll: why is he still there? no one in the division is good enough to take it away? just wanted to ask because you talk as if its easy to be called a champion.:bart
well to be honest it's happend to me when you say somthign then you come back a week latewr to the same thread and have a ton of quotes going "he's running" send him a PM:good
joan guzman will be #1 in your opinion right? peabrain.. at least huki is a more credible guzman fan than you will ever be
At least one good thing has come from all this. Looks like we've laughed kerrminator off the board. I'll be amazed if he replies to my PM.:yep
Still Pac-Man...but I'm a Calzaghe hater...he hasn't done enough to be considered p4p king, the judges robbed Hopkins of a victory in a perfect Hopkins fight...Cotto is the best welterweight but he hasn't done anything in the othe rdivisions...for me P4P King means a multi-weight Champion, for the Pac-Man will stand out still above the rest
you can make a case if he is fighting right now dela hoya or cotto and he lose a close decision or KO'ed but has an impressive showing. but to lose to diaz even if he was at a higher weight from pac would surely pull pac down the rankings.
I agree Pac is number one but for his lightweight reign to hold any significance he must fight WBA/IBF champ Campbell.
I agree to assert himself as a top lightweight he would need to hold the major alphabet belts, but even so, he would still be the P4P King with titles over 4 weights...I laugh at the fool who before put Hatton in his top 5 P4P!
no number 1 p4p can lose and keep his spot IMO. if pbf lost, i would have given the top spot to pac automatically. is pac should lose, by any means, decision, ko, dq, i don't care, the spot should belong to someone else