If you could change one thing in boxing...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PrideOfWales, Oct 19, 2007.

  1. Lar Janus

    Lar Janus Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    0
    All the things you mentioned are high on my pet-peeve list. One I'll add is weigh-ins 24 hours before fight time. Its utterly ridiculous that a fight at, ['officially'] say WW (147), ends up being a fight between two MWs (160) on fight night, or a MW against a JrMW or WW. Why bother having weight classes? I'm a proponent of strictly enforcing the weight limit, no cushion whatsoever--you fight at the weight most comfortable to you. If you come in over, you should be penalized on the cards, fined, possibly even suspended, or stripped of your belt (if applicable).

    If I HAD to pick just ONE thing, it'd be one CHAMPION/division, instead of a bunch of 'titleists'. Jr/Super weight categories are a close 2nd, though, w/15 round fights coming in a close 3rd. Too often, guys don't fight each other due to being 'champions' (the whole NOTION of multiple 'champions' is just stupid!) in different sanctioning bodies; it adds confusion, esp to non-mainstream fans; it allows the sanctioning bodies to play politics; it just, plain SUCKS.
     
  2. codeman99998

    codeman99998 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,713
    Likes Received:
    1
    4 oz gloves.
     
  3. See Me Flow

    See Me Flow The Pharaoh of Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    6,482
    Likes Received:
    2
    Regular steroid testing- in between, before and after fights.

    This content is protected

    :D
     
  4. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    12,059
    Likes Received:
    3,581


    Ha ha, as soon as I saw your name I knew this is what you'd have written. Get over it. Sad ****. :lol:
     
  5. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,161
    Likes Received:
    3
    I'd ban clinching.

    The one belt per weightclass is also a very good idea.
     
  6. theHawtness

    theHawtness Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    less weight class, followed by 1 belt per weight class :good :good
     
  7. marauder1999

    marauder1999 Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,994
    Likes Received:
    1
    Rid the sport of Don King.
     
  8. The Whaler

    The Whaler My dog be thorough. Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,265
    Likes Received:
    3
    One governing body.

    Everything else would fall into place.
     
  9. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,159
    Likes Received:
    3,190
    Ill say 3 things.. Most important to me is..

    1. Better matchmaking.
    2. More free fights
    3. 2 Belts.

    Less weight divisions would be the next, but it is better that the wieght is more strict in certain ways as well, so ill leave that out.. (Although i think anything under featherweight is kind of ridiculous)
     
  10. Better matchmaking! to many fighters are feasting on fighters with poor talent and shitty records just to pad their record, and that's dangerous and how a lot of death's and injuries are happening..
    Also mandatory STERIOD testing before and after fight's.. NO EXCEPTIONS..
     
  11. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2007
    Messages:
    11,864
    Likes Received:
    3
    one unified title per weight
     
  12. Jd!

    Jd! showthread.php?t=74250 Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2007
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    0
    although i agree that one champion would be one of the best things to happen, we have to look at the benefit of the multiple bodies - its the only way some fighters can make it, look at witter, cos of one loss to zudah, he never managed to get another shot for years - im not a fan but it shows that if there was one body, and all had to go throught it, a fighter could be years into his prime before he could make it through especially if one body doesnt like him for some reason. i think maybe the best idea is to keep the 4 bodies, but enfore some form of tournament rule, each champ must make 1-3 defenses - against the top 3 contenders.. then they have to fight each other for the unanimous - it might take a while to get the unaminous but when you do - no one can argue if he is there on merit or not
     
  13. the mean machine

    the mean machine Professional rat catcher Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Send everybody working with the governing bodies replace the militaries in Afghanistan and Irak.
     
  14. Tito Time

    Tito Time slayin um Full Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Messages:
    3,919
    Likes Received:
    1
    One belt
     
  15. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,386
    Likes Received:
    0
    One belt and les divisions