IN any ERA would these guys DOMINATE LB4LB

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bummy Davis, Aug 2, 2008.

  1. chino2dapiapimp

    chino2dapiapimp WBC Fecarbox champ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,814
    Likes Received:
    86
    Relax man the thread maker uses the word dominate very loosely and asked if the guys he mentioned above would dominate if placed in any era. I dont think he ment to use "dominate" litterally but I understand what he means and by that he means to "be the man" at each respective division listed above. Although LEwis has his flaws(like many other fighters of past era's) he will be downplayed by many but I honestly cant see Lewis not being a main player in any era, and I will give him the benifit of the doubt that he would be the "man" more times than not at any given era.
     
  2. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,620
    Likes Received:
    33
    I cannot see lewis dominating in the era's of Ali (60's and 70') thats for sure
     
  3. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,620
    Likes Received:
    33
    Lewis had the longer career I agree, because he never abused his body like mike

    BUT

    Mike never once strugled with the likes of Frank Bruno and Hasim Rahman even when he was past it and not training right. I know he got beat by a 65/1 underdog in Douglas but he had a lot of ability when he was mentally right. he give a world class fighter in Tucker all he can handle for a few rounds in 1987

    The only performances were Lewis looked awesome against credible opposition was:

    Ruddock
    Golota
    Morrison

    The Tua performance was good but far from awesome dispaly. He never showed us anything great

    Many people feel that a shot Holyfield beat lewis in there second fight. Even though he won the first fight, Lewis was poor at the MSG. he should of finished Evander off

    The mercer fight could of went against him. Same with the Klitchko fight. shannon biggs had him in all kinds of trouble in the first round

    Please dont bring up Grant. golota should of finished him in the first round of there fight in 1999. He was PURE HYPE

    I am not a lewis Hater. I rate him as one of the best of all time but to say that he would dominated in any era is a joke. He was unlucky in the fact that he never got to prove himself against a Prime Bowe and Holyfield is well as a still good Tyson
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,008
    None of them would dominate any era because you could always tacticaly place them alongside their kryptonite.

    I think that the only thing that could hold Langford, Robinson or Greb back would be ritual avoidance.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,008
    Curious

    That was the fight when the scales finaly fell from my eyes and I realised that I was in the presece of true greatness.
     
  6. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,479
    Likes Received:
    12
    I wasn´t talking about Lewis but about Tyson. You have to consider his total career and not the few years he looked awesome against inferior opposition. You should answer my posts and not something you think i meant.
    I mentioned before that Lewis wouldn´t even dominate the 30s so i agree with you that he wouldn´t dominate any era - well, the only hw champs who we could speak of them dominating their era i can think of are Johnson, Louis and Marciano. Lewis was the greatest hw of the last era but he didn´t dominate it.
     
  7. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,620
    Likes Received:
    33
    i never meant that final sentance at you mate. i meant it for the starter of this thread