is AJ an all time great

No

 

Not even close. Klitschko had 23 title defenses over 15 years and two title reigns. Joshua had seven defenses over five years. Joshua, from a career perspective, isn't even in the same neighborhood as Wlad.

 

he nowhere close with Norton. ways below.
Norton victor against one of greatest ever. Muhammad Ali. at time when Ali was still great.
also Norton come close in 15 round against with peak prime Larry Holmes. also one of greatest ever, i see it that fight as even match.
same with Jimmy Young. close even match. Young at this time peak prime & high qualify contender.

Joshua beat old men only. & medium or unqualified contender type
the resume is weakness . almost embarrassing weak. not good

 

I don’t think he is even HOF material. But that does not mean he isn’t very good. His resume is pretty good. Right now HOF worthy imo is only Fury and Usyk. Usyk only combined of course with his career at cruiser

 

NO

End of thread lol

 

Joshua is Floyd Patterson. Same place in history.

 

Which is fine, HOF is a bit different from ATG at one weghtclass

 

well Joshua is not an all time great. Right now I don’t believe he is hall of fame either. Had he won yes.

 

Joshua doesn't have the resume some make him out to have. It's pretty weak.

 

The issue with that statement is that if AJ's resume is weak, then Fury's is ****-poor and Wilder's is non-existent

 

Yes, he's an ATG British plonker.

 

Floyd Patterson was the first in history to regain the heavyweight title.
Several had tried before Floyd Patterson, and failed.
AJ is below that, below Floyd Patterson.

 

He's as much of a hall of famer as Frank Bruno is.

 

I believe he comes up a little short.

 

You think he's the second coming?!